- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- academicperfect@gmail.com
Innovative Solutions for Credentialing and Verification
Innovative Solutions for Credentialing and Verification
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Innovative Solutions for Credentialing and Verification
Blockchain technology has the potential to transform the way educational institutions store, share, and verify educational credentials. Blockchain can provide innovative solutions to address the problems of credential fraud, verification inefficiencies, and loss of student data.
Blockchain technology allows for the creation of a tamper-proof digital ledger that can securely store information without the need for a central authority. In the context of education, blockchain can be used to create a decentralized, secure, and transparent system for issuing, sharing, and verifying educational credentials.
One of the primary benefits of using blockchain for educational credentialing is that it provides a way to verify the authenticity of a credential without relying on a centralized authority. Traditionally, educational institutions issue credentials, such as diplomas and transcripts, which are stored and verified by the institution. This can create inefficiencies in the verification process, as third-party organizations may need to request and verify credentials from multiple institutions. Blockchain-based credentialing, on the other hand, would allow for the creation of a shared ledger of all educational credentials, which can be accessed and verified by anyone with permission to do so.
Another benefit of blockchain-based credentialing is that it can help address the problem of credential fraud. Educational credential fraud is a significant problem that affects both employers and educational institutions. According to a report by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation, an estimated 200,000 fake degrees are sold each year in the United States alone. Blockchain-based credentialing can help address this problem by providing a tamper-proof digital record of all educational credentials, which can be verified by anyone with permission to do so.
Blockchain can also provide a solution for the loss of student data. Educational institutions typically store student data on centralized databases, which can be vulnerable to security breaches and data loss. By using a decentralized blockchain-based system for storing student data, institutions can reduce the risk of data loss and ensure that student data is secure and accessible.
In addition to credentialing and data storage, blockchain technology can also be used to create new models for educational funding. Currently, educational funding is often tied to traditional credit systems, which can be difficult for students who lack credit history or have poor credit scores. Blockchain-based crowdfunding platforms can provide an alternative model for educational funding, allowing students to raise funds from a decentralized network of supporters.
However, there are also challenges and limitations to the adoption of blockchain technology in education. One of the main challenges is the lack of awareness and understanding of the technology among educational institutions and stakeholders. Additionally, there are technical challenges in developing and implementing blockchain-based systems, such as scalability and interoperability with existing systems.
Another challenge is the potential for blockchain technology to exacerbate existing inequalities in education. For example, if access to blockchain-based credentialing is limited to those who can afford it or have the technical knowledge to use it, it could create further disparities in access to educational opportunities.
Despite these challenges, there is significant potential for blockchain technology to transform the way educational institutions store, share, and verify educational credentials. As the technology continues to develop and mature, it will be interesting to see how it is implemented and adopted in the education sector.
Innovative Solutions for Credentialing and Verification
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
