- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
HSC 3371 Deliverable Program Outline
HSC 3371 Deliverable Program Outline
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
HSC 3371 Deliverable Program Outline
Competency
Design a public health initiative implementation and evaluation plan. Student Success Criteria
View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane. Scenario
You are part of a local community health core team that is focusing on developing a community program to improve public health status for a growing local concern. You will create an outline for this program. This program outline will be presented to your steering committee for approval to continue enacting the plan. Instructions
Create an outline for this program plan. Complete and submit.Need: What is the public health problem you aim to address with your program?
Targets: Which groups need to take action to ensure progress toward a solution? (This is your target audience).
Outcomes: What actions do the targets need to take?
Activities: What supporting activities do you and your staff need to take to progress the targets from the program awareness phase through to the outcome completion?
Resources: What additional resources or inputs will your team need to implement the activities successfully?
Relationship of activities to outcomes: Which activities are aligned to each outcome?
- HSC3371-Deliverable-5-Worksheet
You may answer in written form, create a table, or illustrate your answer with a flow chart. Every question must be supported by a minimum of one credible resource, although you may re-use resources to answer multiple questions. You need a minimum of 3 credible resources, one of which may be the assigned reading. Follow standard mechanics for spelling, grammar, punctuation, and writing style. ResourcesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Using Evaluation to Inform CDC’s Policy Process. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
UsingEvaluationtoInformCDCsPolicyProcess
Rubric Details
Maximum Score4 pointsGrade for Deliverable 5
100% of total gradeA – 4 – Mastery4B – 3 – Proficiency3C – 2 – Competence2F – 1 – No Pass1I – 0 – Not Submitted0Criterion 1
0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryComprehensive attempt at steering committee outline worksheet, information completed with extensive evidence-based details.0B – 3 – ProficiencyReasonable attempt at steering committee outline worksheet, information completed with sufficient evidence-based details.0C – 2 – CompetenceModerate attempt at steering committee outline worksheet, information completed with some evidence-based details.0F – 1 – No PassRudimentary attempt at steering committee outline worksheet, information completed with few evidence-based details.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0Criterion 2
0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryComprehensive attempt at program plan, extensive resources to support purpose and enactment strategy.0B – 3 – ProficiencyReasonable attempt at program plan, sufficient resources to support purpose and enactment strategy.0C – 2 – CompetenceModerate attempt at program plan, some resources to support purpose and enactment strategy.0F – 1 – No PassRudimentary attempt at program plan, few resources to support purpose and enactment strategy.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0Criterion 3
0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryComprehensive attempt to follow standard mechanics for spelling, grammar, punctuation, and writing style. References are cited in APA format.0B – 3 – ProficiencyReasonable attempt to follow standard mechanics for spelling, grammar, punctuation, and writing style. References are cited in APA format.0C – 2 – CompetenceModerate attempt to follow standard mechanics for spelling, grammar, punctuation, and writing style. References are cited in APA format.0F – 1 – No PassRudimentary attempt to follow standard mechanics for spelling, grammar, punctuation, and writing style. References are cited in APA format.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0HSC 3371 Deliverable Program Outline
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
