- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
How the Type of Culture Influences Organizational Behavior Dissertation
How the Type of Culture Influences Organizational Behavior Dissertation
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
How the Type of Culture Influences Organizational Behavior Dissertation
Organization: Introduction, Thesis Statement, and Conclusion
Total: 4.00
Distinguished – Paper is logically organized with a well-written introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion.
Proficient – Paper is logically organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. One of these requires improvement.
Basic – Paper is organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. One or more of the introduction, thesis statement, and/or conclusion require improvement.
Below Expectations – Paper is loosely organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. The introduction, thesis statement, and/or conclusion require much improvement.
Non-Performance – The introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes How the Type of Culture Influences Organizational Behavior
Total: 4.00
Distinguished – Comprehensively describes how the type of culture influences the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner.
Proficient – Describes how the type of culture influences the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic – Somewhat describes how the type of culture influences the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe how the type of culture influences the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance – The description of how the type of culture influences organizational behavior is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes How the Modes of Communication Influence Organizational Behavior
Total: 4.00
Distinguished – Comprehensively describes how the modes of communication influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner.
Proficient – Describes how the modes of communication influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic – Somewhat describes how the modes of communication influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe how the modes of communication influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance – The description of how the modes of communication influence the organizational behavior is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes How the Nature of Authority Influences Organizational Behavior
Total: 4.00
Distinguished – Comprehensively describes how the nature of authority influences the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner.
Proficient – Describes how the nature of authority influences the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic – Somewhat describes how the nature of authority influences the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe how the nature of authority influences the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance – The description of how the nature of authority influences the organizational behavior is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes How Virtual Elements Influence Organizational Behavior
Total: 4.00
Distinguished – Comprehensively describes how virtual elements influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner.
Proficient – Describes how virtual elements influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic – Somewhat describes how virtual elements influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe how virtual elements influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance – The description of how virtual elements influence organizational behavior is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes How Areas of EQ (Emotional Quotient) Influence Organizational Behavior
Total: 4.00
Distinguished – Comprehensively describes how areas of EQ influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner.
Proficient – Describes how areas of EQ influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic – Somewhat describes how areas of EQ influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe how areas of EQ influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance – The description of how EQ influences organizational behavior is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Describes How Motivational Techniques Influence Organizational Behavior
Total: 4.00
Distinguished – Comprehensively describes how motivational techniques influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner.
Proficient – Describes how motivational techniques influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner. The description is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic – Somewhat describes how motivational techniques influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner. The description is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe how motivational techniques influence the behavior of the organization in a negative or positive manner; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance – The description of how motivational techniques influence organizational behavior is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication: Content Development
Total: 0.85
Distinguished – Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive content to discover and develop sophisticated ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
Proficient – Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.
Basic – Uses appropriate and pertinent content, but does not apply it toward discovering or developing ideas. Overall, content assists in shaping the written work.
Below Expectations – Uses content, though it may be unrelated or inappropriate to the topic. Content does not contribute toward the development of the written work, and may distract the reader from its purpose.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Integrative Learning: Connects to Experience
Total: 0.85
Distinguished – Creates meaningful correlations among experiences outside of the classroom to deepen understanding of field of study and to broaden own viewpoints.
Proficient – Compares life experiences and academic knowledge to distinguish differences and similarities while acknowledging perspectives other than own.
Basic – Recognizes correlation between life experiences, academic texts, and ideas perceived as similar and related to own interests.
Below Expectations – Briefly comments about connections between life experiences and academic texts.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.80
Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.
Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.
Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.80
Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.
Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Page Requirement
Total: 0.85
Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Source Requirement
Total: 0.85
Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Proficient – Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.
Below Expectations – Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.
Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions
How the Type of Culture Influences Organizational Behavior Dissertation
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
