HMD 402 Employment Discrimination Management Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
HMD 402 Employment Discrimination Management Discussion
Read five of the group posts and for each one, reply with 1) if you think the company did a good job responding to the incident, and 2) your estimate (guess) how much money the company could lose if there was a lawsuit because of the incident. Vote for the worst one – not the worst post — the worst case of discrimination/harassment.
- I will attach group 1-16s’ discussion posts in a document. You only have to choose 5 discussions that you want to reply to. Don’t have to read 16 discussions. Replies don’t have to be long .
The discussion was about the personal experience of Employment Discrimination. The questions were:
- What’s the worst incident of discrimination/harassment you’ve witnessed or heard about where you work? If you can’t think of one, then for sure you’ve heard of one from a friend. If you still can’t think of one, make something up – no one will know. Please change ALL of the names or I/we could get in trouble. Even worse — we could lose a donor. 2. Why do you think it happened? — because one person was just racist/sexist/whateverist — because the work culture tolerates it — because the workers don’t complain about it? 3. Did a supervisor or manager know about it? How did the management respond, if at all? 4. If you were the manager and the same thing happened, what action would you take to stop it and make sure it doesn’t happen again?
- Again, you don’t have to answer the questions above. I just wrote it to let you know what the discussions were about. You just have to reply to 5 group discussions on the document with 1) if you think the company did a good job responding to the incident, and 2) your estimate (guess) how much money the company could lose if there was a lawsuit because of the incident that I am attaching.
- Please write group # in front each discussion so I know what groups to reply
- Examples of replies are like:
1.) With all that evidence, the supervisors/managers should’ve taken it to corporate instead of disregarding it for how is as a person. They should take the extra step in doing so to prevent anyone else from being discriminated in the workplace.
2) If a lawsuit were to happen, they would lose about $75,000 or more depending on other fees.
1) I agree that management needed to take immediate action and have the separate meetings with both Taylor and Susan. Hopefully, that would’ve shown Susan its a serious issue that is being investigated. I believe management did a terrible job of responding to the incident, but the group solution is a great way to respond.
2) The lawsuit could’ve ranged $100,000 to $300,000 depending on how many others were harassed and how long this has been going on, especially if the complaints were made to human resources and nothing was resolved.
So clearly the management of the company failed in this scenario. They should never have turned a blind eye to it. they should handle every case seriously and have a talk with him.
This is a case that could have been solved early and with low to no cost. if it escalates I could imagine that this case could end up costing the company up to $70 000 in compensation for you. Taking in consideration that you field a claim and nothing got done.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!