Group Leading Proposal Speech Study Paper Dissertation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Group Leading Proposal Speech Study Paper Dissertation
The purpose of this assignment is to provide disclosure about your meeting and demonstrate learning from the experience by analyzing the session and its participants. You must also assess the effectiveness of your pre-planning and leadership behaviors. References to the course literature are optional; however, familiarity with the terminology and best practices therein must be evident. Your presentation must include the following sections/main points:
Group Dynamics, Content, and Process
Conclusion and Application
Introduce yourself and disclose key facts about your meeting, including: date, time, duration, location, setting and set-up, number of participants, your relationship with them, and whether a co-leader was present. Briefly (in one or two sentences) reiterate the nature and purpose of the group and your prior role and involvement. If the actual meeting and its participants diverted from your proposal, explain why.
Describe the progression of the meeting from beginning to end paying particular attention to group dynamics and how members responded to you and the content you provided for the session. What was the group’s level of engagement and participation and what different leadership techniques did you utilize?
Reflect on your facilitation and evaluate your performance, providing specific examples from the meeting. What were the main challenges you encountered? What do you feel you did well and what do you think you should have handled differently?
Briefly summarize the highlights of your experience and your most important takeaways. How will you apply what you learned to future group leadership? It what areas do you need to enhance your group skills? End with a concluding thought.
When you organize your presentation, you must make sure each required section/main point is sufficiently developed given the time limit. Transitions between subtopics must be clear and maintain flow of thought. The video must be of sufficient quality for a professional setting and show you speaking, ideally from the waist up. Your delivery must demonstrate a willingness to communicate with attention to audience engagement, articulation, pronunciation, tone, absence of vocal fillers, eye contact, posture and movement.
Group Leading Proposal
Introduction and Background
In my career as a behavioral nurse, I have led groups in various meetings that are supposed to bring a change in the norms and practices regarding the required public health requirements. Successfully, such groups have been good, and I always chair them with precision and focus on ensuring that fundamental elements are accomplished as needed. For this group, I will chair a group of community healthcare social workers who are responsible for fighting COVID-19 disease in the community. The choice of the group is good since it delivers the required health guidelines and practices necessary for the accomplishment of the obligations that are fundamental and effective.
The Group Context
The group is an existing organization of community healthcare workers who are charged with the responsibility of quality healthcare delivery. The purpose of the group at this time is to help in curbing the COVID-19 pandemic and mitigation measures in the community. The group has been existent and has varied roles associated with the key metrics and deliverables discharged to them. Successfully, there is a need to focus on the implementation of the basic and right attitudes for effective measures and quality health in the community. Prior to the planned chairing, I had a role in managing the financial resources and other supplies required by the group in the community to help them discharge their required duties.
The meeting will be composed of 10 community healthcare workers, whereby six are makes and four females. The age distribution of the individuals will be between 28 and 35 in orders of seniority from a novice. The meeting will be held in the community social hall from 10:00 am on July 26, 2020. The communication methods that will be used in the meeting will be normal speaking from word of mouth without any form of voice projection as a form of reducing noise. Additionally, a projector and a board will be used to help in the delivery of the right content necessary for successful and right communication in the course of the meeting. My relationship with the community healthcare workers is that they are juniors in the organization, and I do help in giving out directions concerning the upcoming events.
The Meeting Goal And Norms Studypaper
The goal of the meeting will be to help the community health social workers know the right measures to be used prevention of COVID-19 spread within the community. With the various measures in their fingerprint, the goal of the meeting will be to help them identify the loopholes and things that should be done to improve the situation and status quo, which is recommended for effective and right techniques to be implemented as per the measures and effective protocols. The warm-up activities to be performed will be jogging and stretching after every one hour of the meeting since it is supposed to take four hours from 10:00 am. Confidentiality will be assured to the members regarding the issues discussed and involved in the meeting process. For quality outcomes to be accomplished, the members will be assured of their security, and also privacy will be enhanced to promote the right information as necessary, which is key and integral as well.
Meeting Content and Process
The thematic content of the discussion will be on the nature of the prevention of COVID-19 disease in the communities. The level of preparedness and measures put in place will also be discussed to help in control the adverse situations while implementing key metrics and aspects as per the necessary and crucial elements of success, which is necessary. The meeting will be held for four hours, and the supplies will include drinking water and other beverages that are non-alcoholic to be used in the course of the meeting. With the ten members in the room, the meeting will have enough supplies to be used in the facilitation of comfort and the required objectives of the meeting.
The proposed meeting is good since it is supposed to enlighten the frontline community healthcare workers in providing essential health services in the community. With a focused approach and fundamental strategies in the management of challenges, it is a possible and right approach for quality and effective practice, which is necessary for the promotion of best and fundamental practice. The proposed meeting is a breakthrough to the community considering the vital aspects and necessary statistics in the control and elimination of challenges as per the required protocols and interventions of success.
Group Leading Proposal Speech Study Paper Dissertation
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!