Full Stack JavaScript Development with MEAN Stack
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Full Stack JavaScript Development with MEAN Stack
Full Stack JavaScript Development with MEAN Stack in 1000 words
Full stack JavaScript development has become increasingly popular in recent years due to its flexibility, efficiency, and ease of use. One of the most popular full-stack JavaScript frameworks is the MEAN stack, which stands for MongoDB, Express, Angular, and Node.js. The MEAN stack is a set of technologies that allows developers to build full-stack JavaScript applications, from the front-end to the back-end.
MongoDB is a NoSQL database that stores data in JSON-like documents. It is designed for scalability and high availability, and it can handle large volumes of data. Express is a minimalistic and flexible web application framework that allows developers to build web applications quickly and easily. Angular is a front-end JavaScript framework that provides developers with a way to build dynamic, interactive user interfaces. Node.js is a back-end JavaScript runtime that allows developers to build server-side applications using JavaScript.
Building a full-stack JavaScript application with the MEAN stack involves several steps. The first step is to set up the environment by installing the necessary software, such as Node.js, MongoDB, and the Angular CLI. Once the environment is set up, the next step is to create the back-end of the application using Node.js and Express. This involves creating RESTful APIs that can communicate with the front-end of the application.
After the back-end is created, the next step is to create the front-end of the application using Angular. Angular allows developers to build complex, interactive user interfaces using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It provides a set of tools and libraries that make it easy to create dynamic web applications.
Once the front-end is created, the next step is to connect it to the back-end using RESTful APIs. This involves making HTTP requests to the back-end using Angular’s built-in HttpClient module. The data returned from the back-end can then be displayed on the front-end using Angular’s data binding features.
One of the benefits of using the MEAN stack for full-stack JavaScript development is that it provides a consistent, end-to-end solution for building web applications. This means that developers can use a single language, JavaScript, throughout the entire development process. It also means that developers can use a single set of tools and libraries for both the front-end and the back-end of the application.
Another benefit of using the MEAN stack is that it is highly scalable. MongoDB is designed for scalability and can handle large volumes of data. Node.js is also designed for scalability and can handle large volumes of traffic. This makes the MEAN stack ideal for building web applications that need to scale to handle a large number of users or a large amount of data.
In conclusion, full-stack JavaScript development with the MEAN stack is a powerful and flexible approach to building web applications. It provides a consistent, end-to-end solution for building web applications and allows developers to use a single language, JavaScript, throughout the entire development process. It also provides scalability and can handle large volumes of data and traffic. By following best practices and using the right tools, developers can build robust and scalable full-stack JavaScript applications with the MEAN stack.
Full Stack JavaScript Development with MEAN Stack
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!