- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- academicperfect@gmail.com
Full Stack Development Best Practices and Tools
Full Stack Development Best Practices and Tools
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Full Stack Development Best Practices and Tools
Full stack development refers to the process of developing a web application from the front end (client-side) to the back end (server-side) and everything in between. It requires knowledge and proficiency in a wide range of technologies, frameworks, and programming languages. In this article, we will discuss the best practices and tools for full stack development.
Best Practices for Full Stack Development
Planning and Designing: Before you start developing your application, it is important to plan and design it thoroughly. This includes deciding on the architecture, the technologies to be used, and the development process. You should also ensure that your application is scalable, secure, and optimized for performance.
Following Standards: It is important to follow coding and development standards while building your application. This helps ensure that your code is readable, maintainable, and consistent, making it easier to understand and modify in the future.
Collaborating and Communicating: Full stack development often involves multiple developers working on different parts of the application. Effective collaboration and communication are essential for ensuring that everyone is on the same page and that the development process is running smoothly.
Testing and Debugging: Testing and debugging are critical steps in the development process. This helps ensure that your application is error-free and performs as expected. It is important to perform testing at every stage of development, including unit testing, integration testing, and end-to-end testing.
Version Control: Version control is a crucial part of full stack development. It helps you keep track of changes to your code, collaborate with other developers, and roll back changes if necessary.
Tools for Full Stack Development
IDEs and Code Editors: An Integrated Development Environment (IDE) or Code Editor is a software tool that helps developers write and edit code. Some popular IDEs and Code Editors include Visual Studio Code, Sublime Text, and IntelliJ IDEA.
Front End Frameworks: Front-end frameworks provide a set of tools and libraries for developing the client-side of your application. Some popular front-end frameworks include React, Angular, and Vue.js.
Back End Frameworks: Back-end frameworks provide a set of tools and libraries for developing the server-side of your application. Some popular back-end frameworks include Node.js, Ruby on Rails, and Django.
Databases: Databases are used to store and manage data in your application. There are many different types of databases available, including SQL and NoSQL databases. Some popular databases include MySQL, PostgreSQL, and MongoDB.
Version Control Systems: Version control systems help you keep track of changes to your code, collaborate with other developers, and roll back changes if necessary. Some popular version control systems include Git, Subversion, and Mercurial.
Deployment Tools: Deployment tools are used to deploy your application to a production environment. Some popular deployment tools include Docker, Kubernetes, and AWS Elastic Beanstalk.
Conclusion
Full stack development requires a broad range of skills and expertise in different areas of web development. By following best practices and using the right tools, you can build robust and scalable web applications that meet the needs of your users and your business. Planning and design, following standards, collaborating and communicating, testing and debugging, and version control are key best practices that can help ensure the success of your full stack development project. Meanwhile, IDEs and code editors, front-end and back-end frameworks, databases, version control systems, and deployment tools are essential tools that can help you streamline your development process and build high-quality applications.
Full Stack Development Best Practices and Tools
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
