Four Steps of The Control Process Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Four Steps of The Control Process Essay
Analyze how the four steps of the control process and explain how each step contributes to the control function. Describe the three types of controls. How can the effectiveness of controls be assessed in an organization? Is this assessment different for a global organization? Guided Response: In your response, please include detailed information on the four steps of the control process. Also, review the content on budgets and properly incorporate it into your response. Respond to two of your classmates’ posts. Analyze their discussions by agreeing, disagreeing, or adding other ideas to strengthen or enhance the perspective presented in their initial posts.
REPLY TO EDWARD:
The first step of the control process involves creating guidelines for the organization that will be used to reach company goals, which can include setting customer
satisfaction and performance quotas for staff members to reach each day. Evaluating production is the second step of the control process which involves determining
how much sales are made each day, how many products got returned along with customer complaints and how many consumers were satisfied. Performance is also
measured with workers in regards to their attendance, work completion and quality. Daily metrics are then compared to company standards, which will let staff know
what quotas were reached and missed. The last step of the control process involves management contemplating whether to keep metric goals the same or raising them
if colleagues were close to target goals or they exceeded them. If staff members failed to reach company goals by a large margin, upper management may decide to
lower their performance standards where it will be reasonable for staff to reach. For instance, if a local bakery sets sales quota for 5000 a week and workers only reach
2200, management will revise their metrics and reset weekly profits to 3000. The bureaucratic control gives worker instruction through rules and regulations, and not
allowing employees to have input. This type of control can be used to prevent conflicts in the workplace when workers want to resist change. In my opinion, the
bureaucratic control can only be effective in a low skilled working environment. The clan control is colleague friendly work environment because it allows employees to
use upward communication to management. It also benefits the organization by allowing upper management to make better decisions about strategic goals because
they know what changes need to be made in production by way of allowing feedback. The screening control is used by organizations to make sure metrics are
consistently reached. “Delegating authority gives managers the power to use both financial (pay raises and promotions or demotions) and nonfinancial (praise or verbal reprimand) incentives to carry out screening control” (Bierman, Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L., 2016, p. 15.3). Employees will put forth best effort in to their work along with
collaborate with each other if they are getting extra incentives. References Bierman, L., Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2016). Management: Principles and applications,
custom edition. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/books/Bierman.1318.16.1/sections/sec1.1 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
REPLY TO TANA:
The four steps of the control process are: establishing performance standards, measuring performance, comparing the performance against standards, and evaluating
and corrective action (Bierman, Ferrell, & Ferrell, 2016). The control process is similar to a company or department’s quality measurement guidelines. In a hospital’s
radiology department, performance standards are dictated by the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists, OSHA, the Joint Commission, the state licensing
organizations, the FDA and other governmental and insurance organizations. Each licensing body creates performance guidelines and determines ways this can be
measured to assure the desired performance is reached. The next step is comparing the performance achieved against developed standards. The Joint Commission
provides hospitals information from patient surveys that tells management where their hospital scored in comparison to other hospitals and departments in the nation. If leadership realizes there are areas which need improvement, they begin the process of change. Bierman, L., Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2016). Management: Principles
and applications, custom edition [Electronic version]. Solon, OH: Academic Media Solutions
Four Steps of The Control Process Essay
NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!