Foundation of an Ethical Journey Essay
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Foundation of an Ethical Journey Essay
The final project will be a paper that should be the foundation of your ethical journey. It will include identifying and expanding on various pillars of ethical practice which we have identified and elaborated on with each module.
- Trust and Integrity
- Caring Citizen
- Respect and Equity
Explore the five topics listed above individually, under separate headers. Discuss its relationship to individual, professional and workplace ethics. Each topic should be at a minimum of 1 page (and probably will be 2). Resources should be properly incorporated and cited. All resources should be scholarly. This portion of the paper will account for half the grade.
Decision Making Tree
The second half of your project (and grade) has you creating an individual Ethical Decision-making Tree. Each step of the decision making tree needs to include information about if yes/ then go here; if no/ then go to this section.
You should review a variety of business decision making trees before beginning the steps of your tree. I have several Decision Making Trees and ideas listed in the file below this one (Decision Making Tree – Resources). Please be sure to write about your process, and include a time to review, revise and adjust your decision making process based on results.
Decision Making Tree Resources
Here are some additional resources which may be beneficial to your final project. You may also want to review some of the Additional Resources in Module 4.
Ethical Leaders Decision Tree by Constance E. Bagley (from February 2003 issue of Harvard Business Review).
A Guidelines to Making Ethical Business Decisions (from TGS), excellent layout of a decision tree.
Help in Making Ethical Choices (opens in new window) Includes a detailed listing of a variety of companies and their ethical decision making trees and processes.
Explore Decision Tree, Presentations, and More (pinterest pictures) opens in new window This site provides a lot of pictures and a wide variety of layouts for making an Ethical Decision-making Tree.
Foundation of an Ethical Journey Essay
Under 4 Points
Clearly defines concepts, problems, or dilemmas as outlined in the assignment.
Thoroughly answers all questions presented.
Introduces new ideas or concepts.
Utilizes critical thinking tools.
Concepts explored, defines purpose (which may be too broad or too narrow).
Answers all questions presented.
Applies some critical thinking aspects.
Does not address concepts or questions presented.
Lacks an understanding of the material and main concepts.
Flow Ideas are introduced, foundation is laid, a variety of positions explored, individual perspective provided, conclusion reviews main points.
Writing is arranged in a clear, logical order that is easy to follow. Transitions guide the reader smoothly from one idea to the next
Conclusion supported from authoritative sources (several academic sources including text or assigned articles)
Conclusion summarizes main idea and shows why it matters
Ideas are arranged logically
Transitions give the reader some help in following the argument
Conclusion restates main idea
Movement between ideas is abrupt or illogical.
Paragraphs not fully developed.
Paper lacks a beginning, middle, and conclusion.
Examples Excellent and current example(s) integrated which highlight main elements within the paper.
Complete details surround the example are included.
Examples are appropriate. Includes connection to the main points as outlined. Lacks examples, or examples are not appropriate or fully examined. Integration of Material Clearly integrates the module assigned reading materials along with additional resources within the paper. Minimum of 3 resources included (of which one is a new source) Integrates the module assigned reading materials. 1-2 resources included. Does not reference text or assigned reading materials. No resources included. Format
Writing is grammatically correct, void of spelling errors and incorrect use of words. A few minor errors may exist, but these are exceptions.
APA style is followed, including in-text citations for paraphrasing. Direct quotes are infrequent, but documented. References cited are complete.
Some minor errors may exist (no more than 5).
Generally follows the APA format.
All sources used are attributed to original source.
Material is plagiarized
Writing difficult to follow. Numerous errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc.
No references included.
I realize the APA format may be new for some of you. It is not meant to be confusing. However, learning this style will help you in your academic endeavors. If you have not purchased an APA Style book, there are numerous online resources readily available.
I am including links to 3 websites which are all excellent in providing information about the APA format. These have a search option, so you can resolve specific issues (i.e., how do you cite a discussion post, etc.).
Hope you find these resources helpful.
APA Style this link provides quick search for a wide variety of topics as well as a tutorial for beginning (free).
OWL English from Purdue is always one of my favorite websites! Lots of information. Easy to use.
General Rules for APA format provides good general information about APA format and academic writing. Also includes videos.
How Papers are Divided
Typically, your paper will have 4 sections:
- Title Page
- Body of Paper
- References Cited
Foundation of an Ethical Journey Essay
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!