Famous web designers to learn from
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Famous web designers to learn from
Web design has come a long way since the early days of the internet, and there are now many talented designers who have made a name for themselves in the field. Whether you’re a beginner just starting out, or an experienced designer looking to expand your skills, there’s always something new to learn from these famous web designers. In this article, we’ll introduce you to some of the most well-known web designers and provide insight into their design philosophies and techniques.
Jeffrey Zeldman is a web designer, author, and entrepreneur who has been working in the field for over 20 years. He is the founder of A List Apart, an online magazine for web designers, and the design studio Happy Cog. Zeldman is known for his focus on web standards and accessibility, and has written several books on the topic, including “Designing with Web Standards” and “Taking Your Talent to the Web”. He is also an advocate for responsive design and has spoken at conferences around the world on the subject.
Jon Hicks is a UK-based web and graphic designer who has worked with a number of high-profile clients, including Mozilla, MailChimp, and Shopify. Hicks is known for his clean, minimalist designs, and is the creator of the Firefox logo. He has written several books on design, including “The Icon Handbook” and “The Art of the Logo”, and is a regular speaker at conferences and events around the world.
Dan Cederholm is a designer, author, and speaker who is the founder of the design studio SimpleBits. He has worked with clients such as Google, ESPN, and Shopify, and is the author of several books on web design, including “CSS3 for Web Designers” and “Handcrafted CSS”. Cederholm is known for his clean, elegant designs, and is a strong advocate for responsive design and mobile-first design principles.
Ethan Marcotte is a designer, writer, and speaker who coined the term “responsive web design”. He is the author of the book “Responsive Web Design” and has worked with clients such as The Boston Globe, New York Magazine, and Time Inc. Marcotte is known for his focus on mobile-first design and his use of flexible, fluid layouts that adapt to different screen sizes and devices.
Karen McGrane is a user experience designer and content strategist who has worked with clients such as The New York Times, Condé Nast, and Time Inc. She is the author of the book “Content Strategy for Mobile” and is a strong advocate for the use of structured content and responsive design. McGrane is also a regular speaker at conferences and events, and is known for her engaging and informative presentations.
Brad Frost is a designer, writer, and speaker who is the creator of the popular Atomic Design methodology. He has worked with clients such as TechCrunch, MTV, and The Weather Channel, and is the author of the book “Atomic Design”. Frost is a strong advocate for modular design and pattern libraries, and his work has helped to popularize these concepts within the web design community.
Luke Wroblewski is a designer and entrepreneur who has worked with clients such as eBay, Yahoo, and Intel. He is the author of the book “Mobile First” and is a strong advocate for the use of mobile-first design principles. Wroblewski is also the creator of several popular web apps, including Bagcheck and Polar, and has been a regular speaker at conferences and events for many years.
Sarah Parmenter is a UK-based designer and entrepreneur who
Famous web designers to learn from
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!