- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- academicperfect@gmail.com
Exploring the Role of Communication Theories in Change Management
Exploring the Role of Communication Theories in Change Management
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Exploring the Role of Communication Theories in Change Management
Change management is the process of preparing, supporting, and helping individuals, teams, and organizations to make a successful transition from the current state to a desired future state. Communication is an essential element of change management, and communication theories can provide guidance on how to communicate effectively during a change initiative. In this article, we will explore the role of communication theories in change management.
Diffusion of Innovation Theory
Diffusion of Innovation Theory (DOI) is a communication theory that explains how new ideas, products, and technologies spread through a social system. In the context of change management, DOI can help organizations understand how to introduce and implement change successfully.
DOI identifies five categories of adopters: innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards. Each group has different characteristics and motivations for adopting a new idea or technology. Innovators and early adopters are more likely to be receptive to change and are key players in the adoption process. The early majority and late majority require more evidence and reassurance before adopting a new idea. Laggards are resistant to change and may require more time and effort to convince.
To apply DOI to change management, organizations should develop a communication plan that considers the different adopter groups. The plan should include specific communication strategies for each group, such as providing case studies, testimonials, and data for the early majority and late majority, and focusing on the benefits of the change for the laggards.
Social Learning Theory
Social Learning Theory (SLT) is a communication theory that explains how individuals learn and change their behavior through observation, imitation, and reinforcement. In the context of change management, SLT can help organizations understand how to encourage and reinforce the desired behaviors and attitudes.
SLT suggests that individuals are more likely to adopt new behaviors if they observe others modeling the behavior and receive reinforcement for doing so. Reinforcement can come in the form of rewards, recognition, or positive feedback. In a change initiative, the organization should identify individuals who are modeling the desired behavior and provide them with opportunities for recognition and reward.
To apply SLT to change management, organizations should develop a communication plan that emphasizes the modeling of the desired behavior and provides opportunities for reinforcement. The plan should include specific communication strategies for modeling the behavior, such as providing role models and mentoring programs, and providing incentives and recognition for individuals who adopt the desired behavior.
Elaboration Likelihood Model
Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) is a communication theory that explains how individuals process persuasive messages. In the context of change management, ELM can help organizations understand how to communicate effectively with stakeholders and influence their attitudes and behaviors.
ELM suggests that individuals process persuasive messages through two routes: the central route and the peripheral route. The central route involves a careful evaluation of the arguments and evidence presented in the message. The peripheral route involves a less careful evaluation of the message and is more influenced by the source, the message style, and other peripheral cues.
To apply ELM to change management, organizations should develop a communication plan that considers the two routes of message processing. The plan should include specific communication strategies for the central route, such as providing evidence, data, and logical arguments to support the change initiative. The plan should also include specific communication strategies for the peripheral route, such as using credible sources, attractive message styles, and emotional appeals.
In conclusion, communication theories can play an essential role in change management. By understanding the principles of Diffusion of Innovation Theory, Social Learning Theory, and Elaboration Likelihood Model, organizations can develop effective communication strategies that consider the needs of different stakeholders and encourage the desired behaviors and attitudes during a change initiative.
Exploring the Role of Communication Theories in Change Management
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
