- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Exploring the Man Box Research Discussion Responses
Exploring the Man Box Research Discussion Responses
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Exploring the “Man Box” Research Discussion Responses
- well to know if an article or book is credible it would be considered a scholarly (peer reviewed). This contains articles that have been reviewed then critiqued by people in the related field. That way readers can have the confidence that what they are reading holds up to some kind of creditability. Ways that I can check if it is credible is If I turn to the editorial policy page and check if the editors state that the journal contains peer reviewed articles. Or I can just use Kean data bases to be extra sure. I am not sure how to post an article?
My topic will be about exploring the “Man Box” and cause and effect of toxic masculinity. The Journal I am referencing too is called toxic masculinity and mental health by Angelique Jenney Journal. Three features that suggest it is peer viewed is: the title has the word journal in it. Secondly its start with a title abstract. Lastly, because their vocabulary and terms they used. For example, the journal never said boys, kids, teen, guys. They used terms such as Men and young Men.
- In order to know if an article or book is a credible or peer-reviewed academic source, it would be descried as scholarly. The following are features or elements of an article or book one can use to evaluate whether or not it is credible: a “doi,” an abstract, a method section, does the author have a PhD?
My topic is regarding racism and colorism, specifically in the western world. The article posted, related to my topic is an example of a peer-reviewed article because it has an abstract, it was posted by the Society for the Psychological studies of Social Issues, and it has a “doi.”
- In order to know if an article is peer-reviewed or from an academic source it must contains critics from experts related to the field. Another aspect that we can closely analyze is the tittle; if it contains academic words on its tittle, we can definitively say it is credible.
For instance, my topic is in the meteorology field; they are multiple authors for this article and its title is ” Examination of Nudging Schemes in the Simulation of Meteorology for Use in Air Quality Experiments: Application in the Great Lakes Region”, with this title is more than evident that it is a credible and reliable research. Moreover, this article contains an abstract; which makes it even more reliable.
- Determining whether an article or book is a credible / a scholarly source has a lot of factors in my opinion. In my opinion, whatever topic you are researching and whatever sources you are using needs experts in the field. Anyone can give their input, but someone who is credible and an expert in the matter at hand contains more credibility.
Another thing I look for is the references and resources used to generate the article / book. And finally, looking further into the author and title of the book / article. Further researching the author can show more background information and allow for more credibility. The title should also be relevant to the topic at hand.
- To know if an article or book is a credible peer-reviewed academic source is if it would be considered a scholarly. Scholarly or peer reviewed sources most likely has to have people who are directly in the field of the topic. it would be very difficult to talk about something you don’t really know about.
A scholarly article always starts off with an abstract that talks about what the article will consist of and at the end of the abstract are the key words which are in bold. Another thing that can help credibility is further research of the author. Searching to see what the author has done in the past has built credibility for them. Sources are also key as they have to be done properly as they have to be up to date.
Exploring the Man Box Research Discussion Responses
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
