- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Exploration of the Outer Solar System Discussion
Exploration of the Outer Solar System Discussion
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Exploration of the Outer Solar System Discussion
For this module’s discussion 6 we will explore the outer solar system and look at the giant Jovian planets and their moons. As always your discussion post can extend on any of the LO’s… bring in interesting science and discoveries, or you can respond to any of these prompts:
Are Jupiter like planets rare or common? Support your argument with evidence of extrasolar planets and solar systems.
What is your favorite Jovian moon and why? Use details about your moon to convince and teach others about it!
What is the sun’s solar cycle doing now and what are the chances to see the aurora now on Earth an on Jupiter?
Why do the Jovian Planets have rings while the terrestrial planets don’t have them? Could the Earth ever have a ring?
Why should we visit Europa? See the video in the resources below.
What would it be like to live on Saturn’s moon, Titan?
Is there any other moon in the Jovian system that could be colonized
Include in your Journal/ discussion the following.
Part 1. What’s up in the Sky? Moon phases and planets visible… include unusual events like comets or meteor showers. (4 points) reflect on what you saw, or didn’t see due to weather that is up in the sky this module.
Part 2. Optional images, photos, sketches
Part 3. Cover the Learning Objectives. Expound upon a minimum of four Learning Objectives for the module. This is the place to help you learn by taking notes, putting links to web pages, and writing in your words your personal understanding is of the material. This section helps you prepare for the quiz and is the heart of the class. Do not skimp on this. Remember all of the learning objectives will be on the quiz, so it is to your advantage to have more than four Learning objectives covered here. (8 points)
Part 4. Reflect upon at least four Learning Objectives….. Process your notes so you learn. Write out in paragraphs details and what you thought about the learning objective. Put the most interesting or what is the most confusing to give you a way to really learn the material. You chose what is important to reflect upon and to put into your brain and your journal. It needs to be more than one or two sentences. I would like to see four or five sentences of reflection for each of the minimum four learning objectives. ( 4 points)
Part 5. Highlight or Muddy point. I always read this so make it GOOD. What was exciting or the most fascinating this module? Or What does not make sense or blows your mind? Finally, what are you curious about if everything is clear. (4 points)
Part 6. Citations at end … or cite as you go along…. APA format. See Owl Perdue website for APA details. At the very least put the URL so you can go back and look up the material.
Learning Objectives for this module covering the Jovian planets, moons, and rings.
Read chapter 11 and 12 for this fascinating topic.
LO1 Be able to describe the general composition and structure of Jovian planets.
LO2 Compare the four outer planet’s weather patterns: clouds, winds, and storms. OpenStax p 398
LO 3 Describe the characteristics of the giant planets’ magnetic fields.
LO 4 Be able to describe the characteristics of the rings of each of the Jovian planets. OpenStax 12.5 pp 430
LO5 Compare the geology of Jupiter’s four largest moons known as the Galilean Moons: Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto. OpenStax 12.2
LO6 Be able to describe the large moons of Saturn: Enceladus and Titan. OpenStax p 418
LO7 Know that the moons of Uranus are named after Shakespearean characters.
Read chapter 11 and 12 for this fascinating topic.
LO1 Be able to describe the general composition and structure of Jovian planets.
LO2 Compare the four outer planet’s weather patterns: clouds, winds, and storms. OpenStax p 398
LO 3 Describe the characteristics of the giant planets’ magnetic fields.
LO 4 Be able to describe the characteristics of the rings of each of the Jovian planets. OpenStax 12.5 pp 430
LO5 Compare the geology of Jupiter’s four largest moons known as the Galilean Moons: Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto. OpenStax 12.2
LO6 Be able to describe the large moons of Saturn: Enceladus and Titan. OpenStax p 418
LO7 Know that the moons of Uranus are named after Shakespearean characters. Exploration of the Outer Solar System Discussion
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
