- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Examining the Relationship Between Penalties and Workplace Behavior
Examining the Relationship Between Penalties and Workplace Behavior
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Examining the Relationship Between Penalties and Workplace Behavior
The relationship between penalties and workplace behavior is a topic of ongoing interest for researchers and practitioners. Understanding this relationship is crucial for organizations seeking to promote ethical behavior and prevent misconduct. In this article, we will examine the relationship between penalties and workplace behavior, including the role of deterrence theory, the impact of organizational culture, and the influence of individual factors.
Deterrence Theory and the Role of Penalties
Deterrence theory suggests that the severity, certainty, and swiftness of penalties can deter individuals from engaging in misconduct. In the context of the workplace, penalties such as fines, termination, and criminal charges are used to discourage employees from engaging in unethical or illegal behavior. According to deterrence theory, the threat of punishment should increase the cost of engaging in misconduct and make it less attractive to potential wrongdoers.
Research on the relationship between penalties and workplace behavior has generally supported the deterrence theory. Studies have found that the threat of penalties can deter employees from engaging in misconduct, particularly when the penalties are severe, certain, and timely. However, the effectiveness of penalties is also influenced by other factors, such as the organizational culture and individual characteristics of employees.
Organizational Culture and the Impact of Penalties
The organizational culture can significantly influence the effectiveness of penalties. Organizational culture refers to the shared values, beliefs, and practices that shape the behavior of employees within an organization. A positive organizational culture that emphasizes ethical behavior and values can reduce the likelihood of misconduct and enhance the effectiveness of penalties.
Organizations with a strong ethical culture tend to have fewer incidents of misconduct, as employees are more likely to adhere to ethical standards. In contrast, organizations with a weak ethical culture may have a higher incidence of misconduct, even with severe penalties in place. In such organizations, employees may be more likely to justify their misconduct or rationalize it as acceptable behavior.
The Influence of Individual Factors
Individual factors can also influence the effectiveness of penalties in deterring workplace misconduct. Factors such as age, gender, education, and experience can influence the decision-making process of employees and their willingness to engage in misconduct. For instance, younger employees may be more impulsive and less risk-averse than older employees, making them more likely to engage in misconduct. Similarly, employees with lower levels of education or experience may be more vulnerable to ethical lapses.
Personality traits also play a role in the relationship between penalties and workplace behavior. Studies have found that individuals who are more risk-averse or have a stronger sense of moral obligation are less likely to engage in misconduct. In contrast, individuals with a higher level of narcissism, psychopathy, or Machiavellianism are more likely to engage in unethical behavior, regardless of the severity of the penalties.
Implications for Practice
Organizations can take several steps to enhance the effectiveness of penalties in deterring workplace misconduct. Here are some implications for practice based on the research:
Foster a positive organizational culture that emphasizes ethical behavior and values. This can include establishing a code of ethics, providing ethics training, and promoting ethical leadership.
Ensure that the penalties are severe, certain, and timely. Organizations should consider the severity of the penalties carefully and communicate them clearly to employees. The penalties should also be enforced consistently and promptly to maximize their deterrent effect.
Take individual factors into account when addressing workplace misconduct. Organizations should consider the age, education, experience, and personality traits of employees when developing policies and procedures to prevent misconduct.
Implement a comprehensive system of controls and monitoring to detect and prevent misconduct. This can include internal audits, whistleblower hotlines, and anonymous reporting systems
Continuously evaluate and adjust the penalty system based on its effectiveness. Organizations should regularly monitor the incidence of misconduct and adjust the penalties as needed to ensure that they remain effective in deterring unethical
Examining the Relationship Between Penalties and Workplace Behavior
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
