Environment of Poverty and Ways to Measure Poverty Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Environment of Poverty and Ways to Measure Poverty Essay
Module 1 Discussion
Should we worry about inequality? Why or why not? In your post you need to give evidence to back up your position. If you argue that we should worry about it, identify a harm to inequality with an appropriate citation so your classmates understand what evidence you have for your position and where they may look for additional information.
If you argue that inequality is not a problem you also need to provide evidence, either historical of theoretical, with an appropriate citation. Your first post should be original to the discussion. That is, do not duplicate an idea a classmate has already advanced.
Comment on at least two of your classmate’s postings extending or critiquing the discussion. Simply agreeing with a classmate is not enough, rather you need to demonstrate critical thinking in all your posts.
Module 2: Ways to Measure Poverty
Do some research into other ways to measure poverty. Some of you should look at the Multidimensional Poverty Index . Others may be interested in how the EU measures poverty. If you are interested in very poor countries you might want to look at how the World Bank set poverty lines .
For this post, share an alternative measure of poverty and make an argument about why that might be a good way to measure poverty. Multiple students can talk about the same method, but you should not have the same argument – your argument should be original.
Comment on at least two of your classmate’s postings either extending or critiquing the post.
Module 4: Explaining Opportunity
For this group assignment this module you all explored the factors contributing to differential opportunity in a county. For this discussion you will need to do some “leg work” (or keyboard work) to find out how that county is addressing the deficit in opportunity.
Post a description of a policy or program (governmental or NGO) that is attempting to address an opportunity deficit you found. What are they doing? Are they successful? Do you expect them to be? Why might they not be?
Reply to a post by your classmates. How is the program/activity similar or different from what is going on in your county? Might it work well if tried in a different county? Why or why not?
You must have an original post and reply to two of your classmates.
Module 5: Environment of Poverty
Putnam talks about resource gaps between wealthy and poor children. Some resource gaps he mentions are time spent with parents, money invested in extracurriculars, quality of schools, stability of families, and community support. Choose one of these resource gaps and find evidence supporting or contradicting Putnam’s claim. Your evidence may be antidotal stories or statistical evidence.
Comment on two other classmate’s postings by critiquing their evidence, pointing out additional evidence that would be helpful, and/or indicating how this difference in resources may impact future economic opportunities.
Module 6: Digital Segregation
Tyler Cowen talks about how we are increasingly becoming digitally segregated. For example, my twitter feed contains a lot of economists so I tend to hear the views of economists more than others. How are you digitally segregating yourself? For this discussion post, try to include groups that are underrepresented in your digital universe in your social media consumption this week. Write about how you did this and what you learned from it. Did you hear views that were different than your own? Were the subject matters discussed different?
For this forum, make an initial post and comment on two of your classmates posting by asking a question, suggesting to extend the thought, or critiquing.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!