- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Elevator Speech for Pitching Assignment
Elevator Speech for Pitching Assignment
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Elevator Speech for Pitching Assignment
An elevator speech is an excellent way to convey your skills while networking and seeking employment. Typically, an elevator speech is a one-minute summary of who you are, why you are qualified, and what you have to offer the organization or industry. A brief sales pitch will ensure that you are prepared to discuss your career goals whenever the opportunity presents itself. Review the following two Forbes’ articles:
After you have read the articles, develop your elevator speech. The elevator speech should focus on how you practice leadership. Record your speech using one of the following options:
Once you have completed your recording, share your elevator speech with the class by copying and pasting the link of your recording into the body of your initial post. If you are having trouble recording your elevator speech, please contact your instructor.
Listen/view two of your peers’ elevator speeches and comment on how well they presented the following information: who they are, why they are qualified, and what they have to offer the organization or industry.
Example Elevator Speech
Hi, my name is John and I am a student at Ashford University completing my Bachelor of Arts in Organizational Management. For the past five years, I have worked in a leadership role in the food service industry, where I was able to reduce costs and increase revenues. I am seeking to increase my management responsibilities and move into a district manager role where I can help improve company productivity and increase profitability.This is my week 1 intro to help you in completing this assignment.
My name is Mike. I was born and raised in New Jersey and now live in North Carolina. I am married with 3 children and 1 grandchild. I currently work for Novant Health as an Or Coordinator for the past 11 years. I also own a janitorial and concession business.
I have an Associate’s degree with Ashford and now going for my Bachelor’s to achieve a promotion at work. I have only One class remaining for my Bachelor’s. My hobbies are spending time with my grandchild and coaching basketball. I am working on my bachelors in hope of getting a supply chain manager position.
Provided an excellent overview of the cybersecurity industry as a whole. Answered the questions: (a) Why does this industry exist? and (b) How does this industry benefit society? Addressed sources of demand for cybersecurity products and services. Appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources. (Reuse of narrative from Case Study #3 is permitted). Provided an outstanding overview of the cybersecurity industry as a whole. Answered the questions: (a) Why does this industry exist? and (b) How does this industry benefit society? Addressed sources of demand for cybersecurity products and services. Appropriately used information from 2 or more authoritative sources. (Reuse of narrative from Case Study #3 is permitted). Provided an brief introduction to the cybersecurity industry. Addressed why the industry exists and how the industry benefits society. Addressed sources of demand for cybersecurity products and services. Appropriately used information from authoritative sources. (Reuse of narrative from Case Study #3 is permitted). Provided an introduction to the industry but the section lacked some required details. Information from authoritative sources was cited and used in the overview. Attempted to provide an introduction to the industry but this section lacked detail and/or was not well supported by information drawn from authoritative sources. The introduction section was missing or did not present information about the cybersecurity industry. Provided an excellent overview of the operational risks and sources of operational risks which could affect suppliers of cybersecurity related products and services. Addressed the potential impacts on products & services (compromised security). Discussed the potential impact of such compromises upon buyers and the security of buyers’ organizations (risk transfer). Appropriately used and cited information from 3 or more authoritative sources. Provided an outstanding overview of the operational risks which could affect suppliers of cybersecurity related products and services. Addressed the potential impacts on products & services (compromised security). Discussed the potential impact of such compromises upon buyers and the security of buyers’ organizations (risk transfer). Appropriately used and cited information from 2 or more authoritative sources. Discussed operational risks and sources of operational risks which could affect suppliers of cybersecurity related products and services. Addressed the possible impacts on products & services and the impacts upon the security of buyers’ organizations (risk transfer). Appropriately used and cited information from authoritative sources. Provided information about operational risks and sources of operational risks which could impact sellers and buyers of cybersecurity products and services. Appropriately used and cited information from authoritative sources. Provided a discussion of operational risk as it applies to the cybersecurity industry. The discussion lacked detail and/or was not well supported by information drawn from authoritative sources. This section was missing, off topic, or failed to provide information about operational risks and the impacts thereof. Provided an excellent discussion of product liability in the cybersecurity industry. Summarized the current legal environment and discussed the potential impact upon buyers who suffer harm or loss as a result of purchasing, installing, and/or using cybersecurity products or services. Appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources. Provided an outstanding discussion of product liability in the cybersecurity industry. Summarized the current legal environment and discussed the potential impact upon buyers who suffer harm or loss as a result of purchasing, installing, and/or using cybersecurity products or services. Appropriately used information from 2 or more authoritative sources. Discussed product liability in the cybersecurity industry. Summarized the current legal environment and discussed the potential impact upon buyers who suffer harm or loss as a result of purchasing, installing, and/or using cybersecurity products or services. The discussion was supported by information drawn from authoritative sources. Attempted to provide a discussion of product liability in the cybersecurity industry. Mentioned the potential impact upon buyers who suffer harm or loss related to the use of cybersecurity products or services. The discussion was supported by information drawn from authoritative sources. Mentioned product liability but the section was lacking in details and/or was not well supported by information from authoritative sources. This section was missing, off topic, or failed to address product liability. Provided an excellent discussion of the role that standards and governance processes should play in ensuring that acquisitions and procurements (purchases) of cybersecurity products and services meet the buyer’s security requirements. Discussed specific governance process examples from COBIT®,ITIL®, and ISO/IEC 27002. Appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources. Provided an outstanding discussion of the role that standards and governance processes should play in ensuring that acquisitions and procurements (purchases) of cybersecurity products and services meet the buyer’s security requirements. Discussed specific governance process examples from two of the three frameworks (COBIT®, ITIL®, and ISO/IEC 27002). Appropriately used information from 2 or more authoritative sources.
Discussed the role that standards and governance processes should play in ensuring that acquisitions and procurements (purchases) of cybersecurity products and services meet the buyer’s security requirements. Mentioned the use of processes from COBIT®,ITIL®, or ISO/IEC 27002. Appropriately used information from authoritative sources.
Provided a discussion of the role that standards and governance processes should play during the purchase of cybersecurity products or services.Appropriately used information from authoritative sources. Attempted to provide a discussion of the role that standards and governance processes should play during the purchase of cybersecurity products or services but the discussion was substantially lacking in details and/or was not well supported by information from authoritative sources. Section was missing, off topic, or did not mention governance frameworks and standards. Provided an excellent summary and conclusions section which presented a summary of findings including 3 or more reasons why product liability (risk transfer) is a problem that must be addressed by both suppliers and purchasers of cybersecurity related products and services. Provided an outstanding summary and conclusions section which presented a summary of findings including 2 or more reasons why product liability (risk transfer) is a problem that must be addressed by both suppliers and purchasers of cybersecurity related products and services. Provided a summary and conclusions section which presented a summary of findings including the reasons why product liability (risk transfer) is a problem that must be addressed by both suppliers and purchasers of cybersecurity related products and services. Summarized findings which mentioned product liability problems in the cybersecurity industry. Included a summary but did not mention product liability and/or was not well supported by information from authoritative sources. Summary and conclusions were missing. Demonstrated excellence in the integration of standard cybersecurity terminology into the case study. Provided an outstanding integration of standard cybersecurity terminology into the case study. Integrated standard cybersecurity terminology into the into the case study Used standard cybersecurity terminology but this usage was not well integrated with the discussion. Misused standard cybersecurity terminology. Did not integrate standard cybersecurity terminology into the discussion. Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited resources. Reference list entries and in-text citations are correctly formatted using the appropriate APA style for each type of resource. Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited resources. One or two minor errors in APA format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries. Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited resources. No more than 3 minor errors in APA format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries. Work has no more than three paragraphs with omissions of citations crediting sources for facts and information. Work contains a reference list containing entries for cited resources. Work contains no more than 5 minor errors in APA format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries. Work attempts to credit sources but demonstrates a fundamental failure to understand and apply the APA formatting standard as defined in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Reference list is missing. Work demonstrates an overall failure to incorporate and/or credit authoritative sources for information used in the paper. Submitted work shows outstanding organization and the use of color, fonts, titles, headings and sub-headings, etc. is appropriate to the assignment type. Submitted work has minor style or formatting flaws but still presents a professional appearance. Submitted work is well organized and appropriately uses color, fonts, and section headings (per the assignment’s directions). Organization and/or appearance of submitted work could be improved through better use of fonts, color, titles, headings, etc. OR Submitted work has multiple style or formatting errors. Professional appearance could be improved. Submitted work has multiple style or formatting errors. Organization and professional appearance need substantial improvement. Submitted work meets minimum requirements but has major style and formatting errors. Work is disorganized and needs to be rewritten for readability and professional appearance. No work submitted. No formatting, grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. Work contains minor errors in formatting, grammar, spelling or punctuation which do not significantly impact professional appearance. Errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation which detract from professional appearance of the submitted work. Submitted work has numerous errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Work is unprofessional in appearance. Submitted work is difficult to read / understand and has significant errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, punctuation, or word usage. No work submitted. Overall Score Elevator Speech for Pitching Assignment
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
