Educational Psychology Conference Presentation Slide Show
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Create a 610 slide presentation, using the software of your choice, to explain your position paper for a professional conference.
Note: The assessments in this course build upon each other, so you are strongly encouraged to complete them in sequence.
SHOW LESS
Professionals build credibility through professional presentations.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
Competency 1: Describe the current issues, parameters, and central tenets that define the specialization of educational psychology.
Explain fundamental elements of guided instruction and constructivism, using an example.
Competency 2: Evaluate information sources and research designs that are used to answer research questions in educational psychology.
Justify personal position on chosen learning theory through supported research.
Competency 3: Identify individual differences and the biological, cognitive, moral, social, and affective factors that influence learning across the lifespan.
Describe how learning theories differ across the lifespan, according to developmental differences and individual differences.
Competency 4: Describe principles of learning to create appropriate instruction and instructional material consistent with learners and the learning context.
Describe principles of learning to create appropriate instruction for learners.
Competency 6: Evaluate meaningful instruction using best practices from educational psychology theories.
Evaluate pros and cons of both guided instruction and constructivism supported by professional research.
Competency 7: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with university expectations for graduate education, including discipline knowledge and current APA formatting standards.
Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics, and correctly format citations using APA style.
Constructivism
The vision of constructivism is that the individual is active, not simply receiving stimuli as touted in the behaviorist rubric. Constructivists would agree that individuals construct their own understanding of the world, engaging, grappling, and trying to make sense of things. Knowledge develops through the tasks and experiences of the learner. Nevertheless, not all educational psychologists would agree that constructivism is the panacea for learning. Schools that advertise “learner-centered teaching and learning” embrace the constructivist theory.
SHOW LESS
Guided Instruction
Teacher-centered, scaffolded instruction to help small groups of learners understand concepts is considered guided instruction. The subjects that are often taught with guided instruction are reading and mathematics.
Preparation
Use the Resources for this assessment to help you complete your research and presentation. You may wish to review the design suggestions in the multimedia pieces, Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations and Conquering Death by PowerPoint, linked in the Resources for this assessment.
Scenario
Presenters for professional conferences are usually selected based upon the content of a submitted position paper, and the presentation of that paper is done in the form of a presentation. Imagine you submitted a position paper to a professional conference as part of your professional development plan. Imagine that your paper was selected, and you are scheduled to present the key points in 610 slide presentation at the upcoming conference.
Deliverable
The deliverable for this assessment is something you could use or modify for your professional work, or show as a work sample in a job interview.
Create a presentation in which you analyze different positions on guided instruction verses constructivism and presenting your own position.
Although you may use the presentation software of your choice, the basic guidelines for creating an effective presentation still apply. An effective presentation is not cutting and pasting sections of a paper into slides. Slides should not be written in APA format. Produce a final slide that lists all your APA references. Include presenter notes in which you provide the explanation for each slide, so the audience will not see that information during a presentation.
Include the following in your presentation:
Describe how learning theories differ across the lifespan, according to developmental differences and individual differences.
Describe principles of learning to create appropriate instruction for learners.
Explain fundamental elements of guided instruction and constructivism, using an example.
Evaluate pros and cons of both guided instruction and constructivism, using support from professional research.
Explain both the advantages and disadvantages to each instructional approach.
The pros and cons you describe must be supported by evidence in the research or professional literature.
Analyze how developmental and individual differences in the intended audience might impact these learning theories.
Present your own stance on the issue and explain how you came to that conclusion.
Additional Requirements
Presenter Notes: Write presenter notes for each slide. This is the narrative that explains the content of the slide.
Presentation length: 610 slides, including the title slide and the final slide should be an APA reference slide.
References: APA references should be the final slide in your presentation.
Communication: Write clearly and succinctly, with no grammatical errors.
Font size: Title slide font: 36 to 44 point. Text font: 28 to 32 point. Presenter note font: 12 to 14 point.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER 
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!