- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
ECON 2110 Violations of The Academic Integrity Policy
ECON 2110 Violations of The Academic Integrity Policy
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
ECON 2110 Violations of The Academic Integrity Policy
Dr. Martin Gritsch
Assignment 6
A reminder about Academic Integrity from the syllabus:
Cheating in its various forms will be severely punished. The minimum penalty is a grade of zero on the assignment in question, but it can go up to expulsion from the university. If you have not done so yet, please familiarize yourself with the “Academic Integrity Policy” (available online at http://www.wpunj.edu/dotAsset/230122.pdf). All parts of that Policy are relevant and important, but for the online setting of the class, I especially would like to stress sections II.B. (on plagiarism) and II.C. (on collusion).
Please make sure that you truly understand what all parts of the policy mean. To name a few examples, working together with another student on an assignment, getting help on an assignment from someone else (e.g., a tutor), and copying another student’s work are all violations of the Academic Integrity Policy.
There is only one question. Points for the individual parts are indicated in parentheses.
The dependent variable in the regression whose output is shown below is annual salary.
There are three independent variables:
“Education” measures the number of years that an individual attended school.
“Female” is a dummy variable that takes on the value 1 if an individual is female and 0 if an individual is male.
“Interaction term” is the interaction between the “education” variable and the “female” dummy.
(I encourage you to review the Chapter 14 Notes for the interpretation of interaction terms.)
*** Continued on page 2 ***
Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.523077175 R Square 0.273609731 Adjusted R Square 0.250910035 Standard Error 14667.70989 Observations 100 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 3 7779601984 2593200661 12.0534536 9.1727E-07 Residual 96 20653604499 215141713.5 Total 99 28433206483 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Intercept 8575.678652 8211.131374 1.044396717 0.298924637 -7723.287904 24874.64521 Education 2156.871766 614.994162 3.507141855 0.000690743 936.1180326 3377.625499 Female -18767.9211 15546.94099 -1.20717774 0.230329693 -49628.35437 12092.51202 Interaction term 616.9892196 1210.865421 0.509544008 0.611540308 -1786.559584 3020.538024 Note: For parts (a) through (c), ignore the issue of statistical significance of the estimates.
Part (a) (1 point)
Holding education constant, how much higher or lower on average are males’ salaries than females’?
Part (b) (1 point)
What is the average effect of an additional year of education on salary for females?
Part (c) (1 point)
What is the average effect of an additional year of education on salary for males?
Part (d) (1 point)
Are the coefficient estimates of the three independent variables statistically significant? How can you tell?
Part (e) (1 point)
While the “female” estimate is not statistically significant, would you consider it to be of practical significance? Explain your answer.
Page 2 of 2
ECON 2110 Violations of The Academic Integrity Policy
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
