Early Language Development Essay Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Early Language Development Essay Assignment
Week 3 – Discussion 1 – Group 5
From No unread replies. 7 7 replies.
Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your
classmates in Part II of the forum. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of
your responses. Refer to the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon above for guidance on
how your discussion will be evaluated.
Early Language Development
Prior to beginning work on this discussion, review Chapter 5 of your text. This will be a group work discussion in
two parts: 1) a group proposal, and 2) a proposal review response based on your review of the group proposals.
You will need to complete both parts to get full points for the forum.
Part I: Group Plan Proposal
You are working as a teacher in a community with a high population of 3-year old to 5-year old children that
have been identified as English Language Learners. The local school board is awarding an early learning
language grant to a program that submits a comprehensive plan that provides engagement and support for this
population of students. The principal of your school has tasked groups of teachers in your school to create
foundational plan proposals that can be further developed for consideration by the school board. Within your
group, you will develop a proposal that includes the fundamentals of the plan. Each member of your group will
complete one of the three required sections: Learning Center Type and Rationale, Materials and Activities, and Approach and Summary. (Each section should be 250-300 words.)
Learning Center Type and Rationale
Identify the type of learning center that would be most supportive of, and promote language development, of
English Language Learners in the classroom.
Explain the learning objective of this type of learning center and provide a rationale as to why it is the best
choice for providing support to this age group of English Language Learners.
Materials and Activities
Identify the specific areas of language that the selected learning center will target.
Describe a minimum of two activities the planned learning center will offer to support this age group of English
Language Learners, including step-by-step instructions for each.
Create a list of materials that would be needed to support the described activities.
Summary and Community Approach
Summarize the methods for the learning center will use to assess student development.
Explain the general approach that will be used to introduce this learning center to the community.
Describe a minimum of two outreach activities that could be planned to create greater awareness of the learning center in the community.
Week 3 – Discussion 1 (Part II)
No unread replies. 5 5 replies.
Although you are required to complete both parts of the forum, the points for both parts of this two-part forum will be awarded in the Week 3 – Discussion 1 (Part I) group discussion thread. Refer to the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon in Part I for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.
Part II: Proposal Review
For your response in this open forum, you will take on the role of the school principal who will be choosing the best proposal to submit to the school board for consideration for the available grant.
Review and assess the group plans posted to this forum and post your response including the required elements below.
Include the following in your response to your chosen report.
Select one group plan that you feel provided the best proposal.
Explain why you selected this group, calling out the specific strengths of their learning center for the identified age group of learners.
Compare and contrast your chosen plan to at least one other posted and describe how the learning center type, activities, assessment plan, and community outreach approach in your chosen plan will be more effective in addressing the language development issues identified.
Support your opinions using information from the week’s readings, examples from previous weeks of this course, and/or other scholarly or credible resources. Refer to the Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. document for guidance. Properly cite your references.
**Liking has been turned on in this forum. Please click the like buttons next to plans that you think represent good work – even if you do not ultimately choose those as the best option.
Individual Reflection Response Timeline
Day 5 – Post your final single plan document this Part II forum.
Day 7 – Post your response to your chosen plan including the required information within this open forum.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!