- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Disaster Risk Reduction and Resilience
Disaster Risk Reduction and Resilience
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Disaster Risk Reduction and Resilience
Disasters can have devastating impacts on communities and countries, leading to loss of life, damage to infrastructure and assets, and disruption of economies. Climate change and population growth are exacerbating the frequency and severity of natural disasters, making it more important than ever to implement effective disaster risk reduction and resilience strategies.
Disaster risk reduction (DRR) refers to the systematic process of reducing the vulnerability of communities and countries to the impacts of disasters. This involves reducing the underlying drivers of risk, such as poverty, poor urban planning, and climate change, as well as improving the preparedness and response capacities of communities and governments.
Building resilience to disasters is a critical component of DRR. Resilience refers to the ability of communities and systems to absorb shocks, adapt, and recover from disasters. It involves not only improving physical infrastructure, but also strengthening social, economic, and governance systems to ensure that communities are better equipped to cope with and recover from disasters.
There are a range of strategies and approaches that can be used to build disaster risk reduction and resilience. These include:
Strengthening early warning systems and risk assessment: This involves improving the ability of communities and governments to identify potential hazards, assess the risk they pose, and provide early warning to those who are at risk.
Improving physical infrastructure: This involves investing in resilient infrastructure, such as flood protection systems, building codes, and seismic-resistant construction.
Enhancing community-based disaster preparedness and response: This involves empowering communities to take a leading role in disaster preparedness and response, and providing them with the resources and skills they need to be effective.
Promoting disaster risk financing: This involves establishing mechanisms to provide financial support to communities and governments in the aftermath of a disaster, helping them to recover more quickly and effectively.
Fostering multi-stakeholder cooperation: Effective disaster risk reduction and resilience requires the involvement of a wide range of stakeholders, including governments, NGOs, communities, and the private sector.
The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) leads global efforts to reduce disaster risk and build resilience. The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2015, provides a global framework for action on DRR, and sets out specific targets and priorities for reducing disaster risk.
Effective disaster risk reduction and resilience is crucial for achieving sustainable development. By reducing the impacts of disasters, we can protect communities, economies, and ecosystems, and ensure that development gains are not lost. Investing in DRR and resilience is also cost-effective, as it reduces the need for expensive recovery and reconstruction efforts after disasters occur.
In conclusion, disaster risk reduction and resilience must be integrated into all aspects of sustainable development. By working together, we can build a safer, more resilient world for all.
Disaster Risk Reduction and Resilience
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
