- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Different Types of Intelligences
Different Types of Intelligences
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
GC Different Types of Intelligences Discussion
Assignment Goals:
Understand the different types of Intelligences
Identify the most dominant intelligence for well-known international figures
Instructions:
Lets review the definition of each type of Intelligence:
Linguistic intelligence: The ability to read, write, and communicate with words.
Logical-Mathematical Intelligence: The ability to reason and calculate, to think things through in a logical, systematic manner.
Visual-Spatial Intelligence: The ability to think in pictures, or visualize a future result. To imagine things in your mind’s eye.You use it when you have a sense of direction, when you navigate or draw.
Musical Intelligence: The ability to make or compose music, to sing well, or understand and appreciate music. To keep rhythm.
Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence: The ability to use your body skillfully to solve problems, create products or present ideas and emotions.
Interpersonal (Social) Intelligence: The ability to work effectively with others, to relate to other people, and display empathy and understanding, to notice their motivations and goals.
Intrapersonal Intelligence: The ability for self-analysis and reflection–to be able to quietly contemplate and assess one’s accomplishments, to make plans and set goals, the capacity to know oneself.
Naturalist Intelligence: The ability to recognize flora and fauna, to make other consequential distinctions in the natural world and to use this ability productively.
Existential Intelligence: The ability to use collective values and intuition to understand others and the world around them.
Consider the following well-known names (you may look them up online if you are not familiar):
William Shakespeare
Michael Jordan
Mozart
Albert Einstein
Picasso
Gandhi
Charles Darwin
Part 1: For each of these people, Identify THE MOST OBVIOUS type of intelligence they have.
For example, You would say, Shakespeare known for his script writing and poetry and literature, he must have “Linguistic” ability.
Part 2: Once you have matched each name with their intelligence, Now I would like you to list the 9 types of intelligence and suggest a career or occupation that you think would be a good fit.
For example, knowing that interpersonal intelligence means working well with others and have empathy towards people, “Teaching” or “Counseling” might be a good career choice
UCLA Modes of Communication Questionnaire
1 – Siemering outlines what National Public Radio should do in what he calls “cultural mode,” and “journalistic mode.” Explain these two modes.
2 – Siemering identified 7 priorities of program development. Choose three of the priorities that you think are the most significant and explain your reasons for why you chose them.
Different Types of Intelligences
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
