DBPC615, Dobson 4 MAT Review Paper
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
DBPC615, Dobson 4 MAT Review Paper
Dobson 4 MAT Review: Instructions
The 4 MAT Review system is a way of responding to readings that requires the learner to interact with new ideas on several levels. Students will complete a 4MAT Review on Dr. Dobson’s (2004) book, “The New Strong-Willed Child: Surviving Birth through Adolescence,” OR Dobson’s (2012) book, “When God Doesn’t Make Sense.” Choose one of the books and follow the 4MAT guidelines provided below.
The review needs to be formatted using APA style. Use the Template provided.
Please use the following description to guide preparing your 4 MAT Review:
Summary (Knowledge of Content):
Summarize the core points and information in what you have read. Recognize and identify core points in the text. Define, describe and explain the points. Be sure to present a clear, tight and concise summary. Include specific key points and details. The summary needs to be dense with core information from the text. Add in citations since the information is summarized from another author’s work. (1-2 pages in length).
Concrete Response (Comprehension of Content):
Get vulnerable! Relate and describe a specific personal life episode to which core ideas in this book connected. Discuss the life event and explain how it connects to core points in the text. Interpret your life experience in connection to core points in the text. Provide citations to connect to the text. Relate your story in first person writing style. In the teaching style of Jesus, this is a do-it-yourself parable, case study, confession.
You will remember almost nothing you have read unless you make this critical, personal connection that indicates comprehension of the material. This is your chance to tell your story and generalize ideas from the book to your life experience. (up to one page in length).
Application (Application of Content):
How does information in this book influence how you are going to continue your own personal growth process? What actions or changes are you going to make in your life as a result of your learning? What actions do you see yourself adopting based from ideas in the book? Use key points in the text and construct a plan of how you will use the points to guide your personal growth. Demonstrate how you might use specific key points in your life. Be precise in summarizing your action steps. Relate this discussion in first person writing style. Provide citations to connect with the information in the text. (up to one page in length).
Reflection (Evaluation of Content):
What new questions pop up for you in response to what you have read? Keep a rough note sheet at hand as you read. Begin with questions like, “What key points are lacking in full explanation?” Where do I not agree/strongly agree with the author?” or “What bothers me/excites me about this content?” Present a discussion that critiques, assesses and evaluates the core information. Argue core points or topics, fully defending your position. Provide citations to connect with the information in the text. (up to one page in length).
Dobson. J. (2004). The new strong-willed child: Birth through adolescence. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House. ISBN: 9781414391342.
Revised January 2018.
DBPC615, Dobson 4 MAT Review Paper
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!