- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
CUNY RShinny App Project Paper Dissertation
CUNY RShinny App Project Paper Dissertation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
CUNY RShinny App Project Paper Dissertation
Putting it all together
For your final project, I’m asking you to create an exploration of a dataset of your choice. This project should provide people with ways to explore the dataset in a way that will guide them towards learning something about relationships and patterns in the data. The final project will have two graded parts – a Shiny app for end-users and a final paper where you tell us just what you did. Your app and paper should explore two or more particular features of the data you find interesting, and provide an end-user a way to derive new and meaningful inferences from the data within the bounds of the controls you provide them with.
The Shiny App
Your app should present 1) the dataset you are looking at, and a full explanation of what it is (this can be a front page, a tabset, or whatever you would like), 2) provide users at least 3 ways to explore different aspects of the data, 3) provide model fits and statistical tests where it would help the user, 4) useful visual representations that are easy for the user to understand. It should be organized in a way that a user has no problem navigating around, and should not just be one giant pane of overwhelming data and analyses.
The Paper
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
The final paper should be broken up into something along the lines of the following sections. You may feel free to adapt this flexibly given your unique data set and set of problems and questions. But this is a general guide, particularly if you are lost.
1) INTRODUCTION
What is the dataset you are using?
Describe the dataset in detail
Visualize summary information about the data
Based on the data, what types of elements did you want people to be able to explore? What questions did you want them to be able to ask and answer?
2) METHODS
How did you prepare and manupulate the data to get it ready for your app? Write out the workflow(s) step by step.
How did you decide on the ways you wanted the end-user to be able to explore the data? What information did you chose to give to them and why? What choices did you give them and why?
What was the setup of your app? Tell us about the layout you chose, why you chose it, and how it created a
What are the visualizations and analyses that you provided access to?
Show us the types of visualizations you wanted to create to help the data tell its story
What are the underlying models you let the user fit? Why those models? What is their data generating process and your error generating process?
What statistical tests did you return to the user. Why? What did they tell them?
Include a working link to your app
3) RESULTS
What are the most obvious things that you can learn from your app about your dataset?
Based on what people could do in your app, is there any 2-3 visualizations or analyses that stand out? Show them here.
What are other visualizations and analyses that come out of your dataset?
Anything that your app made you think you should go look at?
Any statistical tests of patterns that you can see in your app, but are not formally tested there?
4) DISCUSSION
What did you learn from your app and your exploration of this data?
Does the way you setup your app allow you to learn anything you did not expect?
What feedback did you get about your app?
Do your results suggest additional visualizations/analyses? Feel free to conduct them here.
What final conclusion can you draw about your data set?
SOME MARKDOWN NOTES FOR THE PAPER
As a quick note, you might want to massage you code chunks a bit in your presentation so we don’t see code, error messages, warnings, etc. Remember warning=FALSE, message=FALSE, echo=FALSE, and more are all your friends. For more – including how to resize graphs and such – see here.
If you want to output your statistical results as a table, use knitr::kable or kabelExtra. If you want to build tables that you fill in with text, I recommend this markdown table generator as markdown tables can be tricky.
You might want to use the goodpracticeslibrary and the styler library to make sure your code is readable and accords to good style-guide principles.
Last, here’s a markdown cheatsheet – although Rstudio’s help has a good set of materials as well.
CUNY RShinny App Project Paper Dissertation
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
