CSUN Eugenics Programs Discussion Questions
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
CSUN Eugenics Programs Discussion Questions
- Is there an ethical difference between positive and negative eugenics for human beings? Explain whether you believe one or both to be ethical or unethical? (up to 3 points)
- As a public administrator in a position required to carry out the eugenics program, what choices did you have? How would you have proceeded when the Supreme Court upheld the forced sterilization and eugenics laws in Virginia? Explain your reasoning and reference the course reading/lectures to support your statement. (up to 5 points)
REPLY TO :
There is no ethical difference in both positive and negative eugenics, Its basically choosing to weed out undesirable traits throug selective breeding or through sterilizations/death. This kind of “science” only brings harm to the offspring, it takes away the right of people to choose whether they wish to be sterilized or not, and destroy any perception of choice. Its completely unethical, I frankly don’t see any kind of happiness coming from this, there is no benefit for the most number of people. To me this is completely unethical all the way through.
– As the public administrator specifically one that would use Svarras Ethics Triangle I would use a mix, it is my duty as a public servant to look out for the best interest of my voters and their health. I can’t simply just vacate my seat, because while it will mend my conscience that I would have nothing to do with this, I would still leave my people at the mercy of someone else. In terms of choices you can simply expose the truth (whistleblowing) about the forced sterilizations that were happening. Simply because it is the right thing to do in terms of virtues and like mentioned previously it is my duty to do what is best for my people. If the court basically force me to uphold those laws then I would simply do more to challenge that rule even if it was passed by the court.
REPLY TO :
- Personally, I do not think that there is an ethical difference between positive and negative eugenics. Positive eugenics has to do with the interference of offspring in a way that they create an increase in desirable traits in the offspring, Negative eugenics is the interference of offspring by decreasing the numbers of offspring with “undesirable traits. Both to me seem unethical, in what world is it okay to pick and choose what traits are desirable in offspring. It is ethically incorrect to favor an set of traits in offspring and give them superiority to other. The sterilization of low income and colored people vs the influx of offspring in white wealthy neighborhoods are both very unethically.
- If I was in the position of a public official, my duty would be to uphold any kind of requirement made by the Supreme Court. Would I agree with the requirement? Absolutely not but when you’re working in the public sector I don’t think you have a choice when it comes to enforcing regulation even if you’re morally against it. In past lecture we’ve touch upon the topic of public officials refusing to completely their job obligations because of their personal beliefs, we’ve agreed upon the fact that it is incredibly difficult to but your morals before the law when you work in the public sector. Regardless if the requirement of the law is unethical or not, if it is ruled to be upheld you must do as the law says as a public official.
CSUN Eugenics Programs Discussion Questions
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!