- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Criteria of Fail Pass Credit Distinction and High Distinction
Criteria of Fail Pass Credit Distinction and High Distinction
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Criteria of Fail Pass Credit Distinction and High Distinction
Originality of case and quality of sources.
(20%)
Research case not original.
Few/no primary sources. Few/no secondary sources. No refereed papers.
Research case not original. Minimal primary sources. Minimal secondary sources. Two refereed papers.
Original research case. More than adequate primary sources. More than adequate secondary sources. More than two refereed papers.
Original research case. Impressive primary sources. Impressive secondary sources. Impressive refereed papers.
Original research case. Outstanding primary sources. Outstanding secondary sources. Impressive refereed papers.
Level of analysis and use of BSP concepts.
(25%)
Analysis absent. Little use of BSP concepts.
Minimal analysis (i.e. perspectives identified and described, but only superficially related). General use and understanding of BSP concepts demonstrated.
More than adequate analysis (i.e. perspectives identified, described and differences and similarities discussed). In- depth use and understanding of BSP concepts demonstrated.
Impressive analysis (i.e. relations between different perspectives integrated and implications noted). Impressive nuanced use and understanding of BSP concepts demonstrated.
Outstanding analysis (i.e. nuanced identification of different perspectives and contradictions within sectors; relations between perspectives integrated and implications, patterns and contradictions discussed). Original and outstanding nuanced use and understanding of BSP concepts demonstrated.
Substantiation of arguments and quality of discussion.
(15%)
No discussion or argument.
Minimal explanations to substantiate points. Adequate discussion.
Convincing arguments to substantiate points. Thoughtful discussion.
Relevant and convincing arguments to substantiate points. Thoughtful and in-depth discussion.
Relevant, convincing and nuanced arguments to substantiate points; different perspectives integrated. Outstandingly thoughtful and in-depth discussion.
Critical thinking and reflection.
(15%)
Not demonstrated.
Minimal critical thinking and reflection evident.
Effective critical thinking and reflection evident.
Superior critical thinking and reflection evident.
Outstanding critical thinking and reflection evident.
Quality of conclusion.
(10%)
Simplistic; superficial. Irrelevant ideas presented.
Rather simplistic but relevant.
Succinct and thoughtful.
Insightful and thoughtful with broader implications noted.
Insightful, thoughtful and original with broader implications noted.
Organisation of report.
(5%)
Poorly organised.
Relatively well organised.
Well organised. Effectively organised.
Attractively organised.
Correctness of referencing.
(5%)
Poorly referenced.
Referencing sometimes correct.
Referencing mostly correct.
Almost completely correct referencing.
Completely correct referencing.
Clarity of expression.
(5%)
Unsatisfactory; not clear.
Satisfactory but with difficulties.
Some language mistakes; basically well written.
Very well written with few minor mistakes.
Excellent writing.
Home>Information Systems homework help>FOUR
Number of Pages: 4 (Double Spaced)
Writing Style: APA
Number of sources: 3
Imagine you are the leader of the IT team at the national headquarters for a company supplying western wear to an international market. The owner, Sam Yosemite, tells your IT team to provide support to four (4) new satellite offices but his instructions are vague and incoherent. You only know that the employees in the new offices (numbering about 20 staff for each) will have to be self-sufficient and mirror nearly all the applications used at headquarters, but on minimal budgets. The satellite offices will be in operation for a combined total of 24 hours each day. Each office will operate based on its own set of local business hours, which do not overlap among other satellite offices. Your IT staff is solely responsible for providing support to the satellite offices. Your boss needs to keep the costs for licensing and support low or risk cutting into the budget for the IT staff salaries. Write a three to four (3-4) page proposal paper which covers the following: 1. Differentiate between best uses of Active Directory (AD) versus New Technology File System (NTFS) permissions. 2. Analyze how you would utilize NTFS permissions for security and appropriate access. 3. Compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages of different application server options. Be specific in your configuration specifications. 4. Choose an application server option that best suits the needs described by the scenario and explain why the application server option you chose is best. 5. Determine the best way configure and deploy file server(s). 6. Determine how to configure and deploy printers. 7. Use Visio or a similar tool to depict graphically the physical and logical layout of your plan. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length. 8. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Criteria of Fail Pass Credit Distinction and High Distinction
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
