Criminal Justice Theory Research Study Assignment Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Criminal Justice Theory Research Study Assignment Essay
Specialized and Legal Counsel 1
Specialized and Legal Counsel 2
Criminal Justice Theory
An examination of the criminal justice system’s failures in dealing with mentally ill
offenders is presented in this article, “The effectiveness of specialized legal counsel and case
management services for indigent offenders with mental illness,” written by Bouffard &
Armstrong (2016). The authors have also illustrated that “Legal and case management services
for mentally ill offenders” are also touted as more effective ways of helping in managing them
(Bouffard & Armstrong (2016).
According to the article’s statistics, there are many mentally ill criminals in the criminal
justice system. Among other things, the authors raise the issue of the disproportionate number of
mentally ill criminals in the United States. “Mentally ill offenders make up anywhere from 14 to
16 percent of local prison inmates to as much as 60 percent of the total prison population”
(Bouffard & Armstrong 2016). As a result, this is a clear illustration that the criminal justice
system must pay particular attention to how offenders are overseen. The response of various
jurisdictions to mentally ill offenders is one of the system’s flaws, as the article points out.
Mentally ill offenders in some jurisdictions are diverted to specialized diversion
programs. A portion of the resources available to correctional facilities in jurisdictions where
diversion programs have not been established has to be used for the identification and treatment
of mental illness. By eliminating or decreasing incarceration for mentally ill offenders and
improving the care, they receive while in prison, policymakers and other key stakeholders have
found that these challenges can best be addressed and help address this problem of the mentally
ill inmates. (Bouffard & Armstrong, 2016).
SPECIALIZED AND LEGAL COUNSEL 3
According to the authors, reducing recidivism can be achieved by using mental health
courts and special probation units. Mental health offenders have benefited from these courts
because they emphasize alternatives to incarceration such as community-based treatment and
strictly supervised probation to better the lives of offenders. It also discusses one of the biggest
challenges faced by those with mental illness, which is the lack of affordable legal representation
(Bouffard & Armstrong, 2016).
Most mentally ill offenders are unable to pay for legal representation. Even though legal
representation is always provided, the quality and service models are questionable and
inconsistent. To protect the rights of mentally ill people, court-based programs must be
established. IDC programs for mentally ill offenders are recommended, according to the article’s
Programs such as this one ensures that mental illness offenders will be represented by
attorneys who have been trained to do so. To effectively manage mentally ill offenders, the
program also includes improved case management. Inmates with mental health issues would
benefit from this type of program, which would also reduce the cost of caring for them in prison.
“An IDC program would be a viable alternative in places where mental health courts cannot be
established” (Bouffard & Armstrong 2016).
All the article’s evidence-based arguments and conclusions can be agreed upon. To begin,
the authors convincingly argue that mentally ill offenders face an unfair disadvantage in the
criminal justice system, which is supported by ample evidence. Offenders who are mentally sick
require a different approach. Prisons’ limited resources simply cannot afford to pay for this extra
level of care. A solid foundation has been laid for the case for alternative measures by this
SPECIALIZED AND LEGAL COUNSEL 4
article’s examination of the difficulties people face while incarcerated. Jails could save money if
there were other ways to deal with mentally ill offenders (Skeem & Manchak, 2018).
This is a valid argument because the cost of treating mentally ill inmates daily with
psychiatric medications would significantly increase. Additionally, the facility would have to
hire staff that is trained to deal with the special needs of patients who are mentally unstable. As a
result, these institutions would be forced to use up all their available funding sources, making the
matter even worse.
Mental health courts and specialized probation units (SPU) have also been discussed in
the article, which aims to reduce the number of repeat offenders by the mentally ill. According to
the authors, choosing a substitute to imprisonment helps the psychologically sick offenders
reintegrate into society as better individuals. This is a valid point of view. However, it is
essential to keep in mind that not everyone with a mental illness will respond well to this
strategy. Violent behavior is more common in some forms of mental illness than in others
(Skeem & Manchak, 2018).
A mental health professional would have to determine that the offender is fit to return to
society before he or she could be placed on probation. However, there are exceptions to this rule
for offenders whose behavior is less violent and who do not put the public at risk. To support
their overall argument that specialized services can reduce or eliminate incarceration, the authors
have emphasized the importance of mental health courts and SPU programs.
Finally, the article focuses on how mentally ill offenders can afford to hire a lawyer. This
is an essential factor to keep in mind when dealing with mentally ill offenders, as most of them
cannot afford legal representation. The article goes on to say that the best way to help financially
unstable and mentally ill criminals is to have an IDC program in place to help address this issue.
SPECIALIZED AND LEGAL COUNSEL 5
Using data from an IDC program, the article argues that incarceration for mentally ill
offenders is unnecessary and restrictive. Because this program includes lawyers with training on
how to represent offenders who are mentally ill, it is a more appropriate choice than the current
option. “Despite the fact that an IDC program can replace a fully established mental health court,
it does not guarantee reduced recidivism because it does not include mandatory treatment,
enhanced supervision, or court interactions” (Bouffard & Armstrong (2016).
APPLICATION AND POSSIBLE IMPACTS
This article is especially important because it illustrates the importance of mental health
courts and SPU programs for the mentally ill offenders. According to Sakai (2018),
Policymakers must be involved in the adoption and implementation of an IDC program for
mentally ill offenders in any authority. The first step in the policymaking process will be to
determine if these programs are needed in the authority.
For this purpose, extensive research like that presented in the article is sufficient
evidence. Program quality and cost are essential factors to consider when formulating policy. As
a result of their involvement in these programs, the lawyers and other professionals involved
would require specialized training and compensation (Skeem & Manchak, 2018).
Because of this, funding must be considered when deciding how to proceed. In addition,
the program’s value and effectiveness are essential considerations in the policymaking process.
As a result, this would necessitate extensive, long-term research. An IDC program for the
mentally ill will not be without its difficulties, and it is essential to remember this. For example,
current indigent defense systems face many of these same issues today. This includes, but is not
limited to, a lack of adequate resources, ineffective representation due to occasional case
overload, and a lack of qualified professionals in the program (Skeem & Manchak, 2018). Even
SPECIALIZED AND LEGAL COUNSEL 6
though there will be difficulties, this does not diminish the importance of these programs.
Mentally ill offenders would be guaranteed representation if an IDC program were in place.
As part of the program, incarceration would only be considered in cases where probation
or case management services would not work (Bouffard & Armstrong, 2016). Programs like this
one are designed to provide mentally ill offenders with the best chance to become better citizens.
For people with mental illness, legal and case management services must be tailored to
their unique circumstances. According to the research methodology and conclusions of this
article, community-based IDC programs may be more effective than traditional court systems in
managing mentally ill offenders.
Policymakers and reformers may find this information useful in their efforts. Special IDC
programs can be highly beneficial for mentally ill people who find themselves in trouble with the
law. Still, they are susceptible to problems that affect current indigent defense systems. Legal
and case management services for the mentally ill should be considered (Bouffard & Armstrong,
SPECIALIZED AND LEGAL COUNSEL 7
Bouffard, J. & Armstrong, G. S. (2016). The effectiveness of specialized legal counsel and case
management services for indigent offenders with mental illness. Health & justice, 4(1), 1-
Sakai, R. K. (2018). Care for Inmates with Mental Illness: What Can Nurses Do? retrieved from:
Care for Inmates with Mental Illness: What Can Nurses Do? (spu.edu)
Skeem, J. L. & Manchak, S. M. (2018). Comparing costs of traditional and specialty probation
for people with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 69(8), 896-902. retrieved
from: Comparing Costs of Traditional and Specialty Probation for People with Serious
Mental Illness | Psychiatric Services (psychiatryonline.org)
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!