Control of Syntax and Mechanics Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Control of Syntax and Mechanics Essay
- Understanding Critical Reflectionof one’s cultural self: please begin by watching the video, Why is Critical Reflection Important
- Writing the Essay: When you are ready, please respond to the following prompt
1 Describe: In your reflection of your past communication experience with others, what can be one critical incident you can identify and describe? [Hint: according to our textbook, Intercultural Learning(Jones, et al., 2018), a critical incident is one that “disrupted or made you re-think your assumptions” (p. 26), or one that doesn’t align with a theory/concept you learn from the class. This critical incident, you may interact with people from either the culture you most identify with, or other cultures, as long as this critical incident made you re-think your assumptions of your cultural self.] Please then identify the other critical incident we discuss in class in detail and some reason why you think the comparison between the two incidents might be meaningful. In other words, do they share something in common, which remain different in other aspects?
2 Interpret: can you provide at least two version of interpretation for both critical incidents you identified?
3 Verify: For both critical incidents, test your interpretations by consulting someone familiar with the cultural norm, value or worldviews relevant to the critical incident; you can also find resources (news articles, news interview clips, academic research, government report etc.) that can be your source of verification. Your reference can either confirm or reject your interpretations.
4 Explain: After your verification, you can explain your new understanding of both incidents, by connecting your interpretation with theories and concepts that you have explored in this course.
In your own critical incident, what words have you used and what do these indicate about your perspective of the experience? What assumptions have you noticed in your original description and where might they have come from? What does your description reveal about your values, beliefs or awareness of power? What does this tell you about your cultural-self and others’ cultural practices? [Hint: this is the most critical step and please make sure to cite the theories and concepts you plan to reference here. Please make sure to be as thorough and convincing as possible in your explanation.]
Relating to the other critical incident you intend to compare your own with, how did the person reacted during the incident? How did they make sense of their experience? Does one, or both of the interpretations you provided resonated in some way with how they reacted while on the spot? What does their reaction and interpretation tell you about their cultural-self?
To compare and contrast your critical incident and the other one, what might they share in common? What makes them different? Can you explain, using your understanding of the theories and concepts you referenced earlier, to account for such commonalities or differences?
- Reconstruct:This field note report revisits an important concept, cultural awareness. We learned that cultural awareness “involves not simply knowing something of the nature of culture, or learning about the culture of others. It involves developing a deep and critical awareness of our own cultural selves and our position in relation to issues such as cultural imperialism and racism (Jones, et al., 2018)”.
Looking back at the steps, what does this reflection mean for yourself and your future intercultural communication experience? what new understandings about yourself and others might you share at the end of this reflection? What might you do differently next time in similar situation? How would you describe your position in relation to cultural imperialism, racism or privilege, in view of this analysis?
Your field note should be 1,000-1,500 words and will be evaluated using the category of “Content Development”, “Sources and Evidence” and “Control of Syntax and Mechanics” from the Written Communication VALUE rubric.
Your field note is evaluated using the category of “Content Development”, “Sources and Evidence” and “Control of Syntax and Mechanics” from the Written Communication VALUE rubric.
Completion of the Field Note demonstrates the learning of the following outcomes:
Define culture and explain its elements;
Describe the characteristics of intercultural competency and apply to various intercultural situations;
Define ethnocentrism and bias and explain their influence on perception of self and others;
Identify and critically analyze one’s own cultural identities and worldview in relation to intercultural interactions.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!