- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Conflict Between Iran and The United States
Conflict Between Iran and The United States
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Conflict Between Iran and The United States
Paper #2, 30 April.
Content: This is a good description of the argument over the Iranian UN ambassodor’s ability to reach New York to perform his job, and the United States’ assertion of its own laws to prevent him from doing so. You do a good job telling the story, the reasons for the US’s decision, and what the consequences are so far. What you are lacking is the analytical framework to make this more than an interesting conflict between Iran and the United States. Carr wrote a lot about international law—use some of his ideas to give a context for the case. For example, some of your writing hints at the power of sovereignty in international law. Develop that idea, then point out how the case shows what sovereignty means. Other parts of the paper hint at diplomatic immunity—why does this exist, and what are the challenges to it from Iran and the United States? You tell the story well, but what does it mean in terms of international relations concepts? -See below on what to cite. You lose one point for this.
*Average descriptions, poor analysis.
Communication: Your ideas come through. But there are still places that need a native speaker’s knowledge about syntax. In addition, your bibliography is not following APA style. I am sending you the APA style sheet on citations and bibliographic entries. Use it for your last paper.
-No need to have the words “Running head:” on the running head. The title is enough. And the reader can see that it is a running head. The running head needs to appear on the bibliography page as well as all the others.
-You need to number all your pages, including the bibliography. -See below on indent size. You lose one point for this. -From the typography sheet: Use real quotation marks—never those grotesque generic marks
that actually symbolize inch or foot marks: “and”—not “and.” Same for apostrophes. Be careful of cutting and pasting from the internet—the generic marks show up in this process.
-Just a small thing, but a translator works with texts; an interpreter works with the spoken word.
-Note that page one should be the first page of the paper, not the title page. -Avoid first or second person pronouns in formal academic writing. -Your citations are not following APA format (Sengupta& Gladstone, 2014). This is the
one that you have listed as “Jordain J. Paust.” His name is Jordan J. Paust. Sengupta, S., & Gladstone, R. (2014, 16 April). Iran Escalates Dispute Over U.N.
Envoy, New York Times, p. A11.
-Be sure pronouns and referents agree in number. -Watch out for archaic formulations (e.g., amongst instead of among). When you write
for a British journal you can use them… -Cite by last name only (Friedman, 2013).
Friedman, G. (2010, 12 November). The U.S.-Iran Talks: Ideology and Necessity, Geopolitical Weekly: Stratfor—Global Intelligence. Retrieved from www.stratfor.com/weekly/us-iran-talks-ideology-and-necessity.
-From the typography sheet:
Hyphen is only for breaks in words or lines. It is the one you know from the keyboard, “-.”
En dash is used between words indicating a duration; from 7–9 tonight. Same for page numbers.
Em dash is the champion. Use this, basically, when you would use a semi-colon (look at that hyphen) in writing—if that is what you like.
-Single space within bibliographic citations; double space between them. -Punctuation goes inside quotation marks. The exceptions are rare. -When there is no author, use the article title as the author (instead of BBC). Try this
(US Refuses Visa, 2014). US Refuses Visa for Iran’s UN Envoy Choice Hamid Aboutalebi. (2014, 12 April).
BBC.com. Retrieved from www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-26994936.
Conflict Between Iran and The United States
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
