Concept Of Free Market And Privatization Of Public Goods
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Concept Of Free Market And Privatization Of Public Goods
Student 1. Destynie Ramos
According to Cohen’s (nd) article , it states that the first introduction of the concept of free market and privatization of public goods came to be by Hyack’s book Road to Serfdom that came out in 1944. I believe this book planted a seed for future politicians and leaders to take this concept and allow it to influence their way of thinking. In addition, Milton Friedman’s book, Capitalism and Freedom written in 1962 also provided the framework for the ideologies of free market and public monopoly which are the main ideas behind privatization (Cohen, nd). The influence of these books were used during the presidency of Ronald Regan, who coined the term “privatization” to support the idea of privatizing public goods and services and eliminate public responsibility.I believe that once Regan used privatization in his agenda this opened the door for future presidents and politicians to be influenced by this ideology and use it themselves. Although President Gorge H. W. Bush did not follow the idea of privatization, President Clinton did use the ideology of privatization in an attempt to reinvent government. There appeared to be a pattern after Regan in which some presidents viewed privatization as central to their agenda, for example, Regan, Clinton, George W Bush and Obama used privatization to “improve” government. I believe that after realizing the strategy used to shift responsibility to private sectors, most politicians became to normalize the idea of privatization.
Us as the people, could have intercepted this idea by paying closer attention to the services being privatized and the impact it may have on the public. If the public were more informed about the perils of privatization they may have been more likely to not support the presidents enforcing them. So after Regan introduced the concept of privatization the public could have listened and seen how his ideology either benefited the economy or was detrimental to it and then used their opinions to either support or go against the next political figure who supported privatization. I believe it is possible to turn it around now but it may take some time to get everyone on the same page and fight for the same cause. People need to be informed on how privatization is weakening democracy and the government, so that they can understand why we must fight against it. By doing so, we can support the figure that does not support privatization and give them a platform to make changes and advocate for the public.
Student 2. Kayla Small
In the article “The History of Privatization” by Donald Cohen I thought there could have been many turning points thats led us to accepting privatization. I have to agree with Destynie, that privatization was introduced to the public when Frederick Hyack and Milton Friedman written books about the concept. The idea that another option to “help” the community was available… was step one. Friedman especially promoted two critical ideas that supported privatization, and “gave privatization advocates a new approach by making the distinction between government responsibility and government provision of public goods” (Cohen, nd). Privatization takes away many opportunities for those who cannot afford to obtain services independently (without government support). It wasn’t until cities across the country were facing fiscal crisis, and needed immediate help even if that required change. In my opinion, this was the beginning turning point in which privatization was normalized, but was fully accepted during the Reagan Years. Ronald Reagan’s election was what conservatives needed to minimize government contributions, and increase privatize public services (Cohen, nd). Although Reagan’s platform discussed much more than privatization, he definitely embraced the idea of privatization. The people may have intercepted at this point, because as the president many will follow.
I think its going to be extremely challenging to turn the privatization back into full government support. For one, many people in corporate have profited off of privatization. Corporations contribute mainly to the wealthy population, and they tend to protect each others assets. Secondly, because corporate has control over the privatized businesses (that are also benefiting the government), the government will do what they can to protect them. Even if that requires the corporations to bribe those for continuous support. To fully answer the question, I cannot see things changing unless everyone comes together to fight for a change.
Concept Of Free Market And Privatization Of Public Goods
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!