Compliance and Limiting Systems Square Essay

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Compliance and Limiting Systems Square Essay

Compliance and limiting systems square measure sets of tips and best practices. Associations follow these tips to fulfill limiting requirements, further develop processes, fortify security, and win elective business targets. In the benchmark that aims to bridge the gap between frameworks and compliance, we will focus on Cigna Corp, a medical-based company. Some of the significant services offered by the company managed care services. Additionally, the company provides clinical, life, and insurance products (Berg, Kölbel and Rigobon, 2019). The company has more than 150 million clients spread in more than 25 nations around the world. With these customer demographics, the company is able to outfit noteworthy of knowledge that deals with the whole personal wellbeing thus driving to better wellbeing results.

Cigna’s objective is for all business specialists to practice compliance day by day throughout addressing the organization. Since it is a medical-based company, the company applies HIPAA regulations. These rules ensure the privacy, security, and accessibility of all e-PHI they create, receive, store, or send. They also recognize and guard against reasonably anticipated threats to the data’s security or integrity. HIPAA standards also protect against reasonable expectations of prohibited uses or disclosures. HIPAA regulations must be followed at all times (Wu, Spafford and Zeni, no date). They guarantee that individuals’ wellbeing information is appropriately secured while considering the movement of wellbeing information needed to give and propel first-rate clinical benefits and guarantee the overall population’s wellbeing and success.

It is generally expected in most medical services offices, like emergency clinics, to keep in touch with data. A covered medical services supplier might depend on a person’s casual consent to list in its office catalog the patient’s name, general condition, strict connection, and area in the supplier’s office(Wu, Spafford and Zeni, no date). A covered substance is any medical services provider who, regardless of measurement, electronically sends health data about specific exchanges. A major motivation is to define and limit the circumstances in which a person’s protected health data may be used or disclosed by protected elements.

With a security control framework such as NIST, the Cigna Corp Company can protect patients’ data from being accessed by unauthorized individuals. Since the NIST framework is generally a set of rules and best practices that aims to assist associations with building and further developing their network safety pose, the framework can distinguish, protect, Identify, react, and recover critical patient information(Almuhammadi and Alsaleh, 2017). These assist the medical-based company with overseeing network safety hazards by getting sorted out data, empowering risks the executive’s choices, tending to dangers, and gaining from past exercises.

NIST gives guidelines to suggested security controls for data frameworks at government organizations, such as Cigna Corp Company. NIST distributions, a large number of which are needed for bureaucratic offices, for instance, within Cigna Corp Company, can fill in as intentional rules and best practices for state, nearby, and ancestral legislatures and the private area. NIST framework may give sufficient profundity and expansiveness to help associations (such as Cigna Corp Company) of many sizes select the sort of execution that best accommodates their exceptional conditions(Almuhammadi and Alsaleh, 2017). NIST security norms and rules can help the necessities of HIPAA regulations since organizations can use them to give an organized yet flexible structure for choosing, indicating, utilizing, and assessing the security controls in data frameworks.

References

Almuhammadi, S. and Alsaleh, M. (2017) ‘Information Security Maturity Model for Nist Cyber Security Framework’, pp. 51–62. doi: 10.5121/csit.2017.70305.

Berg, F., Kölbel, J. and Rigobon, R. (2019) ‘Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings’, SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3438533.

Wu, R., Spafford, E. H. and Zeni, N. (no date) ‘Towards HIPAA-compliant healthcare systems Related papers’.

 

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.

GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER

CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow

Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!