- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Community-Based Disaster Risk Management
Community-Based Disaster Risk Management
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Community-Based Disaster Risk Management
Community-Based Disaster Risk Management (CBDRM) is a holistic approach to reducing the risk and impact of disasters on communities. It is a participatory, bottom-up process that empowers communities to identify, assess, and prioritize their disaster risks, and to develop and implement strategies to reduce these risks. CBDRM recognizes that communities are often the first to respond to disasters, and that their involvement is critical for effective disaster risk reduction and response.
Disasters can have devastating effects on communities, destroying homes, livelihoods, and essential infrastructure. They can also have long-lasting impacts on social, economic, and environmental systems. Traditional top-down disaster management approaches, which rely on government agencies and external organizations to respond to disasters, have been criticized for their lack of local engagement and participation. CBDRM seeks to address these shortcomings by placing communities at the center of the disaster risk reduction process.
CBDRM involves several key components, including community mobilization, risk assessment, risk reduction planning, and implementation.
Community Mobilization: The first step in CBDRM is to engage and mobilize communities. This involves raising awareness of disaster risks and encouraging community members to participate in the risk reduction process. Community leaders, women, youth, and marginalized groups should be particularly encouraged to participate.
Risk Assessment: The second step is to assess the disaster risks faced by the community. This involves collecting data on past disasters, identifying potential hazards and their impact, and assessing the vulnerabilities and capacities of the community. Community members should be involved in the risk assessment process to ensure that it reflects their perspectives and experiences.
Risk Reduction Planning: The third step is to develop a risk reduction plan based on the results of the risk assessment. The plan should prioritize actions that address the most critical risks and vulnerabilities, and should involve the community in its implementation.
Implementation: The final step is to implement the risk reduction plan. This involves carrying out the prioritized actions and monitoring their progress. The community should be involved in the implementation process to ensure that it is effective and sustainable.
CBDRM has several advantages over traditional top-down disaster management approaches. First, it promotes local ownership and participation, which can increase the effectiveness and sustainability of risk reduction efforts. Second, it allows for the integration of local knowledge, perspectives, and experiences into the risk reduction process. This can lead to more context-specific and effective risk reduction strategies. Third, it can increase the resilience of communities by building capacities and improving their ability to respond to disasters.
However, implementing CBDRM can also present challenges. For example, communities may lack the resources, capacities, and knowledge to effectively participate in the process. Additionally, there may be a lack of political will to support community-led approaches, or a lack of coordination among different actors.
To overcome these challenges, it is important to ensure that CBDRM is integrated into broader disaster risk reduction and development efforts. This requires collaboration between communities, government agencies, and other stakeholders, and the provision of adequate resources and capacities.
In conclusion, CBDRM is a critical approach for reducing disaster risks and building resilient communities. By empowering communities to identify, assess, and prioritize their disaster risks, and to develop and implement strategies to reduce these risks, CBDRM can lead to more effective and sustainable disaster risk reduction. However, its implementation requires adequate resources, capacities, and collaboration among different actors.
Community-Based Disaster Risk Management
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
