Communication Self-Reflection Paper Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Communication Self-Reflection Paper Essay
Fall Semester 2021
Points Possible: 75 points
Due Date: 11:59 pm on Wednesday, December 15th
Purpose: This paper is an opportunity for students to reflect on their experiences with public speaking as they approach their second speech. The goal of this assignment is to give students a way to demonstrate what they have learned while also exploring ways to improve their upcoming speeches.
- The focus of this paper should be your growth as a public speaker during the semester, but how you choose to address this topic is up to you. Ask yourself what you knew about public speaking (think concepts from our textbook) before this course, then focus on what you have learned. Be sure to discuss where you can continue to improve your public speaking in the future, in addition to what you have already accomplished.
- The paper is to be written in essay form, with a distinct introduction (including a thesis statement and a preview of the organization of the paper’s main points), a body, and a conclusion.
- The paper should be approximately four pages in length, typed in 12pt. font, double-spaced, single-sided, and conform to guidelines for written assignments listed in the syllabus.
- Papers mustinclude a reference page and cite course concepts (from the textbook or other articles we read in class). You can also conduct outside research, although it is not required. All facts, paraphrases, and quotations must be accompanied by a citation formatted according to one of the approved style manuals. Whichever citation style you choose, it is your responsibility to research the format and use it correctly and consistently.
Consider the following questions to guide your paper:
- Where was your comfortability for delivering speeches at the beginning of the course?
- Are you more confident now?
- What did you do to prepare for your speeches?
- How was your experience while delivering the speech?
- How did you feel after?
- Is there anything you gained from listening to other presentations?
- How would you improve your performance for your next speech?
- Finally, how do you plan on approaching the next speech given the feedback given by you, your instructor, and your peers?
Assignment Due Date: This assignment is due no later than Wednesday, December 15th at 11:59 pm. You will upload your paper on Canvas for submission to turnitin.com. *
* You may “opt-out” of participating in turnitin.com. If you choose to do so, you must notify me in writing by attaching your request to a hard copy of your paper.
Grading criteria (what I am looking for):
How well organized is your essay? Does it flow smoothly and logically from one point to the next? Do you back up your points with specific examples? Do you identify and cite your sources properly? Do you understand the concepts from this course? How thoughtful is your essay? How creative is it?
Assignment/Writing Assistance: If you have any questions about this assignment, please contact me. If you need help with your writing, feel free to visit the University Writing Center in person or visit their website (http://www.fresnostate.edu/artshum/english/writingcenter/)
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!