Chinas Current Anti-Monopoly Law Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
China’s Current Anti-Monopoly Law Assignment
Question 1 (Word limit: 1,000 words)
Futurist World Ltd is a leading Australian software company based in Melbourne. It has long been coveting the huge software market in China.
Robin Lipton, the CEO of Futurist World Ltd, is keen to set up a business structure in China as soon as possible. To make sure that the company
makes the right decision on its China plan, he wants succinct answers to the following questions: What is China’s policy toward foreign investment
in terms of entry mode, location entry and industry entry? Which business structure (an equity joint venture, a cooperative joint venture, or a wholly
foreign owned company) is better for Futurist World Ltd to do business in China, and why? Under China’s current Anti-Monopoly Law, how are
mergers and acquisitions involving foreign investors regulated?
Question 2 (Word limit: 500 words)
China’s new Labour Contract Law is the most significant reform to the law of employment relations in more than a decade. It was promulgated by
the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on 29 June 2007 following highly contentious debates over the terms of earlier drafts –
debates involving not only a range of Chinese parties, but also international business lobbyists and labour organisations. On the one hand, there is
an urgent need for better protection of workers’ rights in order to maintain the social and political stability. On the other hand, the implementation
of this law might increase labour costs, making production in China more expensive and forcing many businesses to shut down. The Labour
Contract Law represents a compromise between the competing demands of business and labour. How responsive is the new Labour Contract
Law to areas of concern identified by various stakeholders? What contribution does the new law make to social stability?
Question 3 (Word limit: 500 words)
Chelsea and John are the shareholders and directors of a company registered in Beijing, China. They each own 50% of the shares in the company.
The company constitution does not contain dispute resolution mechanisms. In recent months, they have a major dispute over profit allocation.
Chelsea wants to take the matter to the People’s Court; John wants to go to arbitration while both their families suggest that they work it out
through mediation. Compare mediation, arbitration and litigation and advise them on the best method for dispute resolution.
Question 4 (Word limit: 1,000 words)
China is a country that celebrates hard work and success in business. To be successful, companies face enormous competition to get to the top
and stay there. Effective corporate governance plays an important role in helping companies to survive and thrive in an increasingly competitive
environment. Chinese regulatory bodies have made considerable efforts to improve the corporate governance of listed companies. However,
corporate governance in practice is still problematic. What are the major corporate governance problems and enforcement issues faced by
Chinese listed companies? Why is it difficult to solve these problems? What are your own suggestions for making corporate governance more
effective in China?
l Please use Harvard referencing style for the references. (only need in-text referencing, do not need reference list)
l Please use following relevant sources (see the attachments); do not research beyond these sources.
Chinas Current Anti-Monopoly Law Assignment
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Chinas Current Anti-Monopoly Law Assignment