Case Study on Rosies New Pet Paper
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Case Study on Rosie’s New Pet Paper
Leaving an elementary school one afternoon, we poked our heads into a classroom and observed a teacher arranging the computer area of her classroom in preparation for a scheduled parent–teacher conference.
“Margaret, you think of every last detail,” we remarked.
“If that were true,” she replied, “I would have figured out how to give everyone the
opportunity to use these computers more. I am given so much material to teach for the tests, I never have the time to find the software and games that the kids will really enjoy.”
After leaving Margaret, we saw the parents, a family we knew, who were coming to the family conference. Inquiring about the family, the father promptly told us of his daughter’s current fascination with her new online digital pet.
“We had been to several stores to find this creature because it is really hard to find and Rosie has in her mind that if she gets it, then she can build her online pet family. It is one of those limited-release toys that come with a special story and a registration number that is tied to an online video game.”
“It is really interesting what the animals do,” Rosie’s father continued, “because when you buy one of them you are allowed to play a game with the animal. The animal’s collar has a special ID tag that you use within the world of other special creatures. Since playing in the game, Rosie has bought a house for her pets, food, and she even has a virtual hot tub! Now if only I could get her to manage her homework and her real live pets like she manages this virtual world.”
Wk 6 Activity
- Go to the neo-K-12 Website, located at http://www.neok12.com/, to review educational video games. Review two (2) video games of your choice. Be prepared to discuss.
- Review the National Educational Technology Standards for Students (NETS-S) located at http://www.kelloggllc.com/tpc/nets.pdf. Be prepared to discuss.
“Educational Software” Please respond to the following:
- Discuss three (3) software applications that you have utilized in a K-12, higher education or business setting. Determine the purpose for the software being used for this setting, and evaluate the effectiveness of the software application based on the target population. Provide specific examples for your rationale.
From the first e-Activity, evaluate the characteristics of your chosen games using the criteria in Table 7.3 in the text. Suggest an e-Learning strategy for each game that you believe would enhance students’ levels of thinking when they play the designated games. Provide specific examples of the recommended strategy in use to support your rationale.
TABLE 7.3 Rubric for Evaluating Higher Order Thinking in Video Games
Characteristics Yes/No (1/0) Requires users to assume a role in the game rather than simply play. Offers meaningful interaction such as dialogue with NPCs (characters in the game). Has a storyline. Has a complex storyline with characters users care about. Offers simple puzzles. Has complex puzzles requiring effort to solve. Uses three-dimensional graphics. Allows multiple views or camera pans and the ability to zoom in and out. Allows different ways to complete the game. Simulates complex processes requiring adjustment of variables by users to obtain desired results (adjusting variables leads to different results). Allows interactions through use of avatars (an online identity adopted by the game player). Uses lifelike avatars. Requires interaction with virtual elements within the game. Requires knowledge of game elements beyond mouse prompts and number entry (e.g., combining elements to create new tools, understanding complex jargon). Requires gathering of information in order to complete. Requires synthesis of knowledge in order to complete or successfully engage elements in the game. Effectively replicates real-world environment. NPCs display AI (artificial intelligence) characteristics. NPCs display effective use of AI resulting in dynamic experiences for the user. Offers replay abilities with varying results. Total Score
Source: “Assessing Higher Order Thinking in Video Games” by John W. Rice, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(1), p. 93. Copyright 2007 by the Association for the Advancement ofcomputing in Education (AACE). (www.aace.org) Reprinted with permission.
“Digital Games for Learning” Please respond to the following:
- From the case study, propose two (2) ways that Margaret, the teacher, can use digital games in the classroom. Suggest one (1) digital game from the neo-K-12 games that you reviewed that you believe provides the greatest benefit for Margaret. Provide a rationale for your recommendation.
- * From the second e-Activity, select one (1) NET-S standard not used by another of your classmates, and suggest two (2) approaches for using digital learning games in the classroom in order to meet the selected NETS-S standard for students. Provide specific examples of such use of games in the classroom from your personal experience to support your rationale.
Case Study on Rosies New Pet Paper
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!