Case Study Assignment in Rogerian Science
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Case Study Assignment in Rogerian Science
Charlie Dee, a 56-year-old male client, has smoked two packs of cigarettes per day for the past 30 years. After being diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, he is visiting nurse practitioner Sandra Gee for the first time. Eliciting the client’s narrative of his experience with this sickness, his impressions of his health, and how the disease manifests itself is the first step in pattern appraisal (symptoms). Mr. Dee claims that he has a productive cough that becomes worse in the mornings, that he is short of breath when he exercises, and that he is always weary. The nurse practitioner discovers that Mr. Dee’s sleep patterns and dietary consumption have changed after asking him particular questions. He sleeps for shorter periods of time and eats less. She also discovers that Mr. Dee’s wife smokes and that their pets are indoor cats. He doesn’t believe his wife will be willing to change her ways or get rid of the cats. During this assessment, the nurse tries to figure out what matters to Mr. Dee and how he defines health.
Mutual patterning entails exchanging information and providing options. The nurse recounts what she has been told and how she understands it at the end of the appraisal. In this approach, the nurse and the client may agree on what activities are appropriate for Mr. Dee. Ms. Gee informs him about the disease and makes solutions to help him feel better. Breathing retraining, advice for a high-protein, high-calorie diet, eating smaller meals more frequently, sleeping with the head raised, and performing progressive relaxation exercises before bedtime are all noninvasive therapies. The nurse advises the Dees to purchase a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter and humidifier to help remove pollutants from the air and maintain correct humidity levels in the home.
Because Mr. Gee has shown a wish to quit smoking, the nurse proposes that he complement his nicotine patches with forms of centering, such as guided imagery and meditation. She also gives him written information regarding the disease, which he can give to his wife. Mr. Dee says he feels better knowing he has the capacity to improve some aspects of his life at the end of the visit.
Activities that promote critical thinking
1. Analyze two published research articles using Rogerian science as a framework for conducting research. In each article, identify the middle-range hypothesis that was established or directed the research process.
2. What is the nature of the evidence created by critical thinking activity 1’s middle-range theory research?
3. What Nightingale philosophical concepts contributed to the formation of the Rogerian conceptual model?
4. Find three articles and analyze how the authors applied Rogerian science to nursing education.
5. Examine your clinical practice and find places where Rogerian science-based practice could improve nursing care. Make a list of the modifications and the expected good results.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!