- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Case Analysis on Nursing Leadership
Case Analysis on Nursing Leadership
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Case Analysis on Nursing Leadership
Gerald is a nurse leader who impacted change in their organization to be focused on in this case study. In the health care organization that Gerald worked, nurses and doctors conducted ward rounds separately. The separate ward rounds created many inefficiencies in the organization, including ineffective communication between the nurses and the doctors (Amann et al., 2017).
The doctors and nurses also experienced duplicate work being done and inefficiencies in treatment, which affected patient care quality, resulting in longer hospital stays and readmissions. Gerald as a nurse leader-led change by encouraging doctors and nurses to perform ward rounds together. The transformation was only a trial to help nurses and doctors experience firsthand the improvement in care that this change would have. In the end, the collaborative ward rounds were implemented as a necessity in delivering care for inpatients.
Success in the change was experienced as the nurses and doctors felt a reduction in workplace stress, improved satisfaction in work, and reduced workload, which motivated them to adopt the change. An improvement noted in patient outcomes was also a factor that enhanced the adoption of the program in the health care organization.
Despite the success, Gerald experienced several obstacles when implementing the change including, competing for clinical priorities of the health care personnel, inadequate planning since multidisciplinary ward rounds require planning, and absence of training in the skills that are essential to provide intricate interdisciplinary team care (Royal College of Physicians, Royal College of Nursing, 2021). Also, nurses initially felt sidetracked when performing the multidisciplinary ward rounds (ineffective communication between the nurses and the doctors (Kurhila et al., 2019).
The obstacles were addressed by adequate planning to ensure that doctors and nurses have a schedule on how they conduct the ward rounds, which helped reduce the competing clinical priorities. Before the multidisciplinary ward rounds were implemented, the health care personnel were trained on how to carry out the program and its significances.
Number 2 post: MH
Gladys Beatrice Carter was a nurse leader who was successful in spearheading change and impacting healthcare policy. She was a Canadian nurse midwife whose work started in the 1930’s when she mapped out a blueprint for healthcare reform (Rafferty, 2018). She saw the need to separate nursing “service” from education and upgrading nursing education to better align with public health needs.
She argued that it was the conditions under which nurses were trained and educated, worked and had to pursue a living and their career opportunities which prevented them functioning to their full potential. Along the way, Carter encountered resistance and scrutiny. In 1946, a Minority Report produced by the National Health Service (NHS) and Working Party on Nurse Recruitment and Training recommended reducing the training period of nurses from three to two years (University of Edinburgh, 2018).
She believed that building a better educated workforce with the cognitive capability and know-how to make effective, evidence-based decisions delivered better health outcomes for patients, families and populations (Rafferty, 2018). Carter continued her fight, supporting her cause and presenting evidence to university committees considering the case for establishing an undergraduate degree for nurses. Her perseverance paid off in 1959, when she presented evidence at the University of Edinburgh.
The evidence included studies that were completed at the University of Toronto and confirmed the benefits of investment in nurse education for public and population health. This was not accidental but strategic move on Carter’s part to be involved at both Universities. The Rockefeller Foundation had very strong interests in public health at these universities and ended up funding a nurse education program and a nurse training program at the University of Edinburgh (Rafferty, 2018).
Case Analysis on Nursing Leadership
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
