- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Case Analysis on Corporate Data Breach of Ashley Madison
Case Analysis on Corporate Data Breach of Ashley Madison
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Case Analysis on Corporate Data Breach of Ashley Madison
Do Discussion #2 over your choice of the following two cases studies:
Option A: Case Study #3: “The Corporate Data Breach of Ashley Madison.” Be sure you have read the instructions and the grading rubric. (I won’t remind you of this again. By now you should know.)
You may choose ONE of the following questions for your focus for this case study:
- What are the rights of customers who engage in e-commerce? What is a company’s responsibility with regard to the personal information of customers and other stakeholders?
- Is it appropriate or ethical for a company such as Ashley Madison to profit by embracing a mission that promotes infidelity among people in marriages or committed relationships? (Notice that there is a difference in this question and asking whether or not it is legal.)
Option B: Case Study #4: “Legalizing Marijuana in the United States.”
Question for cast study #4: In what ways is a decision about legalizing marijuana for recreational use different from a decision about legalizing it for medical use?
Answers to Questions 1 through 7 can help gather the information necessary for performing an ethical analysis. Based on this information, one can develop a decision that has the strongest ethical basis.
Who are all the people affected by the action? (Stakeholder analysis)
Is the action beneficial to me? (egoism)
Is the action supported by my social group? (Social group relativism)
Is the action supported by national laws? (Cultural relativism)
Is the action for the greatest good of the greatest number of people affected by it? (utilitarianism)
Does the action treat every stakeholder with respect and dignity, and is the act something that everyone should do? (deontology)
Is this how a virtuous person would act? (Virtue ethics)
If answers to Questions 2 through 7 are all “yes,” then do it.
If answers to Questions 2 through 7 are all “no,” then do not do it.
If answers to Questions 2 through 7 are mixed, then modify your decision.
If answers to Questions 5, 6, and 7 are “yes,” this action is the most You may need to modify this decision in consideration of any “no” answer to Questions 2 through 4.
If answers to Questions 5, 6, and 7 are “no,” this action is the least Modify this decision in consideration of these objections.
If answers to Questions 5, 6, and 7 are mixed, this action is moderately Modify this decision in consideration of objections raised by Questions 5, 6, or 7. You may need to further modify this decision in consideration of any “no” answer to Questions 2, 3, or 4.
Grading Rubric for Case Study Discussions
Reasoning and Analysis 40%
Weak reasons and/or irrelevant or confusing reasons given that do not support the answers; incomplete answers.
Reasons support answers with some reasons or an important reason overlooked; general examination and assessment.
Clear and accurate answers; insightful, specific.
Accuracy of Facts and Citations 40%
No evidence of research to obtain factual information or evidence. Mostly opinion or “I think” type statements. Incorrect facts and / or citations.
All facts are accurate and support the argument, but there were also some opinion-based statements. There was no clear evidence of research given by supporting documentation.
All facts are accurate and the argument. Evidence of research was documented, and the factual information was used in an appropriate manner to support the thesis. At least one source (e.g., the textbook) was quoted in the case study.
Form and Style 10%
Citations not in correct style manual form.
Citations are partially in correct style manual form. Citations are perfect or close to perfect in correct style manual form.
Mechanics/ Organization 10%
Numerous errors; the paper was very difficult to read; questions were not stated before answers; major spelling, grammar, and punctuation problems; many sentences were unclear.
Enough errors to distract the reader; organization problems; some spelling, grammar, and punctuation problems; some sentences were unclear.
Use of correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation; well organized; one idea follows another in a logical sequence with clear transitions; easy to read and navigate.
Case Analysis on Corporate Data Breach of Ashley Madison
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
