Brewton Business Scenario
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Brewton Business Scenario
Running head: Brewton Business Scenario
Brewton Business Scenario 4
Date of submission:
As the project manager, I will be responsible for the planning, procurement, and implementation of the ERP system proposed by Brewton business. To ensure the success of the project, I will require the input of several stakeholders during the implementation process that will play different but interconnected roles. The first key stakeholder will be Mark Brewton, Chief Executive Officer.as the leader of the company, Mr. Mark has directed the IT director to acquire and implement the enterprise system, and he holds the view that it will help streamline accounting and purchasing processes. Mr. Mark will play an oversight role as well as developing the ERP implementation team and assessing its overall performance. He will also be responsible for approving the entire project budget with input from the chief finance officer.
The second stakeholder will be Mike Benson, the Information Technology Director. The IT director and his team will be responsible for the day to day operations of the ERP software and the infrastructure that connects all employees to the ERP system. The IT director will also be responsible for drafting the project budget. The third key stakeholder will be Barbara Scharer who’s the Chief Financial Officer for the company. Barbara will be in charge of the financial management section of the proposed ERP system. She will also be interested in the budget proposal that will be submitted by the IT director and will be responsible for its approval (Lech, P. 2016).
Finally, the last stakeholders I will involve in the implementation process will be the users and employees at the company. New systems bring about change in any business due to the implementation of a new and different set of business processes, and this mostly leads to change resistance (Lech, P. 2016). User input during the implementation process will be essential in fulfilling all requirements and harmonizing all issues raised as well as providing a channel for users to interact with ERP system before it’s finally rolled out (Lech, P. 2016).
The entire process of implementing an ERP system can bring numerous challenges for all stakeholders involved. These challenges have the potential of derailing the project progress or lead to its complete failure (Seo, G. 2013). As the project manager, I’ve acknowledged a few challenges and the first challenge anticipated while working with the above stakeholders is the lack of effective communication. To avoid this, during the ERP implementation process I will ensure effective communication by organizing meetings where all stakeholders will air their opinions and provide feedback. Another challenge is employee morale. Individuals assigned to ERP projects are often put under the stress of lengthy working hours with extra workload and sometimes no off days (Seo, G. 2013). This is not exempted for Brewton’s case since the ERP system will be expansive and be developed to serve many users. The stress which is associated with the implementation can potentially decrease the stakeholders’ output and negatively impact the implementation process. To counter this, I would propose that the company’s executive leadership which comprises of the CEO, CFO, and human resources director must provide flexible working hours to achieve better results.
The human resources needed to implement the ERP system will consist of different individuals performing different roles, and the first one is the project manager (Lech, P. 2016). Being the project manager, I will be involved in managing the project team, project budget, and ensuring that the schedule is adhered to. The second human capacity needed will be the IT director and his team whose main role will be to assist with installation and configuration of the system and also providing technical training to all employees.
The third human resource needed will be the system administrator who will be responsible for the collective setup and technical aspects of the administration of the ERP system. The final human capacity needed will be the technical support team who will assist employees and customers with ongoing operational issues. This team will deal with the continuing needs of both users and customers during implementation and even after roll out.
For the purposes of using the system production mode, several computers and network resources will be required, and they include desktops, monitors, and laptops together with fast and reliable servers which should be hosted in an expanded server room in the IT department. The enterprise system will also be customized to ensure that future releases and updates from the vendor are easy to be integrated into the deployed system (Lech, P. 2016). An SQL server database that supports all the ERP application will also be built and integrated into the network. The network for the entire production floor will be built using category six cables since they can run for distances of up to 100 meters and deliver high and reliable speeds of up to 100 Mbps.
Lech, P. (2016). Implementation of an ERP system: A case study of a full-scope SAP project. Journal of Management and Finance, 14 (1), 49, 64.
Zach, O. (2012). ERP system implementation in small and medium-sized enterprises.
Tambovcevs, A., & Tambovceva, T. (2013). ERP system implementation: benefits and economic effectiveness. publication. editionName, 215-221.
Seo, G. (2013). Challenges in implementing enterprise resource planning (ERP) system in large organizations: similarities and differences between corporate and university environment (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!