BL 480 Legal Conflicts by Law Report Dissertation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
BL 480 Legal Conflicts by Law Report Dissertation
Written Assignment #2: Recall that Kyle and his family own a successful produce business near Whitehouse, AL, close to Hamilton. Their produce (fresh and canned vegetables, fruits, etc.) is sold under their own label, Alabama Sunshine. Kyle likes the small-town environment of Whitehouse where business is usually done with a phone call or a handshake. Unfortunately, Kyle is a bit too trusting, assuming that all people are as honest as he is, or tries to be.
Having received the $20,000 deposit from Alabama Best Foods (recall WA1), Kyle decided that the family’s roadside market needed something to draw attention to it, like a scene painted on the front wall. Kyle saw an ad by Pai Caso, a local painter, and contacted Pai about painting the scene. Pai agreed to do the painting for $4,500. Unfortunately, Pai, who never intended to paint the market but only intended to take Kyle’s money, had a reputation for not starting painting commissions or starting the work but never finishing as he had done this to several other businesses in nearby Winston County.
Pai even got his friend, James Bama, to talk with Kyle about how competent Pai was, and to explain that Kyle should not be concerned about paying Pai a commission in advance. Upon his advice, Kyle wrote Pai a $2,000 check one week before he was to start the job. Pai transferred the check to Clyde Caldwell in exchange for Clyde’s 1995 Ford Windstar van, which was worth $1,800. Before Clyde had a chance to deposit the check, the local Winfield newspaper ran several news stories about Pai and the fraud that he had committed. In the meantime, Clyde transferred the check to Bama, who then transferred it to Sal Dali. Bama gave Clyde value for the check, and Dali gave Bama value. Kyle was unaware of these transactions and had not read the stories about Pai in the local paper.
Putting any problems with Pai out of his mind, Kyle liked the idea of upgrading the family market and decided to purchase some computer equipment from Friendly Computer Services (FCS). Kyle worked out the details with FCS; however, when the FCS’ technician arrived to install the equipment, Kyle realized that he was out of checks, having written the last one to Pai. He needed to pay for the equipment and installation so he found a check that was drawn “payable to Kyle, in trust for Donald.” Donald is Kyle’s minor nephew who periodically receives disbursements from a trust fund and Kyle is his guardian. Kyle, wanting to get the equipment installed, indorsed the check to FCS in payment for the computer equipment and installation costs. FCS accepted the check as indorsed and completed the installation.
Kyle knew that his computer skills were lacking and that installation of the any new computer system can have glitches and would involve a learning curve, especially for Kyle and his family to get up-to-speed. Elbert has a business in which he consults with small businesses. Kyle contracted with Elbert to daily stop by and check on the new system, answering any questions about its operation. Since Elbert charges by the hour and since Kyle intends to take a few days off back down at Gulf Shores, AL (to celebrate his contract with Alabama Best Food.),
Kyle gave Elbert a signed check with the amount blank for Elbert to fill in based on $100/hour. Actually, Kyle left the check on top of the computer just before he headed to Gulf Shores. Kyle also had a check on top of the computer that had the amount of $500 filled in, but no payee and no signature. Elbert got greedy and took the check, converting the $500 to $5,000 and signed Kyle’s name. Then Elbert filled out the check that Kyle had given him in the amount of $4,000, rather than the $200 he had earned at $100/hour. Elbert transferred both checks to Farley, a holder in due course, who is now seeking payment from Kyle.
Three months have passed since Kyle wrote Pai Caso the $2,000 advance check and, as of yet, no paint has been applied to the roadside market. Kyle is aware of the transfer of his check from Pai to Clyde to Bama and then to Dali. He is also concerned about the check that he gave FCS. And, now he is being contacted by Farley. Since Kyle knows that you are knowledgeable in the finer points of negotiable instruments, he comes to you for guidance on these situations.
Note: As with all Written Assignments, this is to be your own work with no help offered, given, or accepted as per our Class Code of Honor.
To help you organize your thoughts, I suggest that you read the fact set; decide which facts are relevant and which are merely verbiage; based on the information in Unit 2, decide which legal information is relevant to the facts; then state the relevant facts, state the relevant law, and apply the law to the facts, taking the issues one at a time. WA has three or more main issue with related issues. Be aware that the issues are difficult. There are no minor issues intended in WA. When you are ready to submit your work, attach it to WA Dropbox under Unit 2 Assessments.BL 480 Legal Conflicts by Law Report Dissertation
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!