Benefits of Collaborative Documentation Discussion Post Dissertation

 Benefits of Collaborative Documentation Discussion Post

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Benefits of Collaborative Documentation Discussion Post

PEER #1 SYLVESTER

The importance of collaborative documentation cannot be overemphasized. With the use of collaborative

documentation technique, both the clinician and client would be attuned with their goals and objectives, progress in

achieving their goals, interventions, and recommendations for subsequent sessions (Schmelter, 2013). Again, when

such technique is used, it provides easy access for healthcare professionals to record and update documents such as

planning updates, and assessment updates.

Some of the benefits of collaborative documentation technique is that it improves risk management as well as areas

related to care coordination. More so, the use of collaborative documentation technique provides easy access to other

team members in a clinical setting. It also helps to improve the treatment plans of healthcare professionals (Schmelter, et al. 2012).

PEER #2 NOEL

Integrated care helps patients and providers to provide diversified care for patients at one location. This practice

creates a team-based method involving mental health care and medical care to achieve record-breaking results.

Integrated behavioral health and primary care practice widens the quality of care and results in a harmonized health

care facility (Ratzliff, Phiilips, Sugarman, Unützer, & Wagner, 2017). A behavioral health provider provides interventions

for their clients regarding the behavioral change, motivation, cognitive and behavioral interventions used to help

patients change their lifestyle. Integrated care is the way of the future in the health care system because people have a

longer life expectancy worldwide. People from all over the world utilize a multitude of health services and social care

services to meet the population’s changing needs. The knowledge and skills of various disciplines will need to be

integrated into facilities. For example, Doctors’ offices are limited to providing all health care needs for

multipleconditions (Heyeres, McCalman, Tsey, & Kinchin, 2016). Adults with mental illness, co-occurring disorders, and

physical limitations will need referrals to see a specialist such as a behavior therapist and psychologist. An integrated

care system is beneficial for patients with multiple health conditions because they have access to critical needs in one

place.

Reference:

Heyeres, M., McCalman, J., Tsey, K., & Kinchin, I. (2016). The Complexity of Health Service Integration: A Review of Reviews. Frontiers in public health, 4, 223. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2016.00223 Ratzliff, A., Phillips,

121. E., Sugarman, J. R., Unützer, J., & Wagner, E. H. (2017). Practical Approaches for Achieving Integrated Behavioral Health Care in Primary Care Settings. American journal of medical quality: the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality, 32(2), 117–121. doi:10.1177/1062860615618783

PEER #3 ROSHAUNDA

Collaborative documentation is a patient-centered approach, also known as concurrent documentation, which allows

for the client and professional to come together and go over the progressive notes (assessment, service planning,

client-practitioner interactions, and other documentation) as a team to help assist with developing a beneficial plan to

bring about overall positive well-being (Hirsch, 2012). Collaborative documentation allows for the client to add their

own input into their plans, which gives them the opportunity to be engaged in their progress and plan outcomes.

Integrating a system of collaborative documentation helps the team (client and professionals) provide services in a

central location, which can increase results during the plan implementation process; this can increase the quality of life

of the client, which also improves quality of care. Benefits of collaborative documentation include improved

responsibility from clients and professionals in the pursuit of their plan goals, helps keep the client engaged in

theirtreatment set up, and it also improves how the integrative health care team come together to perform care

coordination.

An administrator can increase motivation by showing how the documentation improves plan goals and outcomes, it

can build trust in the professional relationship which can motivate the client to continue the process, and they can

increase motivation by showing them how much collaborative documentation brings about positive change by allowing

them to have a say (part) in their treatment plan.

Benefits of Collaborative Documentation Discussion Post

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.

GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER

CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow

Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!