Aristotle Regards Passions and Feelings Like Anger
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Aristotle Regards Passions and Feelings Like Anger
Question 16.16. Aristotle regards passions and feelings like anger as: (Points : 1) a sign that one lacks rational control over one’s state of mind.
always either an excess or a defect in one’s character.
capable of excess, defect, or the intermediate state characteristic of virtue.
Both (a) and (b).
Question 17.17. Midgley analyzes the position that each society is a separate culture with its own values. This position is known as (Points : 1) Moral relativism
Moral isolationism
Moral structuralism
Moral voluntarism
Question 18.18. What, according to Tom Regan, is the contractarian approach to ethics? (Points : 1) The view that individuals have rights because of a set of rules that they agree to follow, as with agreeing to the terms of a contract
The view that all animals have rights because of the agreements that we have made (or should make) with them
The view that what is morally relevant is the pain and suffering that an animal endures when we mistreat it
The view that all humans have equal rights independent of particular abilities
Question 19.19. Thomas Nagel argues that all rules of engagement should be governed by the utilitarian principle that (Points : 1) any means can be justified if it leads to a worthy end
the greatest good can justify targeting noncombatants
we are always justified in attacking the tyranny of the majority
none of the above
Question 20.20. According to Thomas Nagel’s article, “War and Massacre,” the absolutist position that creates no problems of interpretation is (Points : 1) rule utilitarianism
act utilitarianism
pacifism
humanitarian intervention
Question 21.21. Rachels claims that most actual cases of killing: (Points : 1) are morally worse than most actual cases of letting die.
are morally the same most actual cases of letting die.
are morally less bad than most actual cases of letting die.
are morally required.
Question 22.22. Michael Walzer argues that in the unique world of war, both morality and authority are (Points : 1) radically contested
established by rules of war
established by neutral states
none of the above
Question 23.23. According to Mill, utilitarian morality holds that: (Points : 1) If each individual strives to maximize their own happiness, the happiness of all will follow.
Each individual is required to sacrifice their own individual happiness for the happiness of all.
With the right social arrangements and education, individuals can come to associate their own individual happiness with the happiness of all.
Neither the happiness of the individual nor the happiness of all is worth pursuing, since neither is attainable in this life.
Question 24.24. Nagel argues that the atomic bomb attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were just like what other kind of action, just on a larger scale? (Points : 1) Killing the wife and child of someone attacking you in order to distract him from his attack.
Bombing a munitions factory and killing some of the civilian workers inside.
Firing at an enemy soldier and hitting an innocent bystander with a stray bullet.
Bombing a convoy of enemy soldiers.
Question 25.25. According to the scene from The Bridge on the River Kwai, what is the ultimate reason Colonel Nicholson (Alec Guinness) insists that the soldiers work hard to build the best bridge possible: (Points : 1) Because even in captivity, they know that God is watching them.
So that the British forces will be able to fight the Japanese more effectively.
Because the better the bridge, the more benefit they will receive and less punishment they will endure from their captors.
Because it is an expression of the strength and dignity of a soldier even in captivity.
Question 26.26. Which of the following makes it difficult to calculate the utility of an act (Points : 1) the time frame of the consequences
disagreements about the meaning of pleasure or happiness
determining what constitutes the greatest good
all of the above
Question 27.27. Hill claims that a fruitful way to think about the badness of destroying the environment is: (Points : 1) To think about what kind of human would choose to destroy the earth.
To appeal to theories about God and care for the earth.
To examine people’s intuitions about whether it is right to harm the environment.
To examine the rights that belong to the environment and act on the basis of those rights.
Question 28.28. Robinson describes magnanimity as the mean between the extremes of: (Points : 1) Vanity and vice
Generosity and selfishness
Generosity and greed
Vanity and pusillanimity
None of the above
Question 29.29. In the video “Sexism in the News Media 2012” some newscasters blame military women for this (Points : 1) being killed in combat
being raped
not being able to have children
being war heroes
Question 30.30. Rachels concludes that: (Points : 1) active euthanasia is always worse than passive euthanasia.
passive euthanasia is always worse than active euthanasia.
active euthanasia is always morally permissible.
none of the above.
Question 31.31. In Gilligan’s article, the example of Heinz involves which crime (Points : 1) theft
murder
arson
racketeering
Question 32.32. Robinson suggests that the more closely one associates with one’s identity with a certain group, the more one will (Points : 1) Associate one’s honor with defying the honor of the group
Associate one’s honor with that of the group
Associate one’s honor with that of the enemy group
Associate one’s honor with the honor of prudence
None of the above
Question 33.33. Tom Regan discusses the concept of indirect duties. Having only indirect duties towards animals means (Points : 1) That we have a duty not to harm animals but only because of the harm it might do to humans
That we have no duties regarding animals whatsoever
That our duties towards animals are equal to our duties towards humans
That we actually have greater duties to animals than to humans
Question 34.34. In Gilligan’s example, the child named Amy focuses on this aspect of the Heinz dilemma (Points : 1) the logical nature of the problem
a utilitarian calculus that weighs the options
Kohlberg’s theory of moral development
the relationships involved in the dilemma
Question 35.35. According to Aristotle, we should begin ethical inquiry by specifying: (Points : 1) which things are intrinsically valuable.
the ultimate aim of all that we do.
what our fundamental duties are.
what constraints on behavior it would be reasonable to agree to.
Question 36.36. According to Rachels, active euthanasia involves: (Points : 1) the intentional termination of one’s life by another person, to relieve pain and suffering.
ceasing to use “extraordinary means” to prolong someone’s life.
intentionally causing a patient’s death, against the patient’s wishes.
the refusal to treat a patient to avoid incurring unnecessary costs.
Question 37.37. Hill would agree most with which of the following statements? (Points : 1) Plants have rights that grant them certain ethical merit.
Plants should not be harmed because of their use value to humans.
Plants do not have rights.
Plants have the same rights as animals.
Question 38.38. The Ring of Gyges gave the shepherd who found it (Points : 1) Intelligence
Invincibility
Invisibility
Wisdom
Question 39.39. What is palliative care? (Points : 1) Treatments that relieve suffering for people in life threatening situations that allow them to live their lives to the fullest.
Treatments that are only provided in Canada.
Treatments that heal people when they face life-threatening illnesses.
Treatments that involve painful processes that help to kill cancer and other diseases.
Question 40.40. Michael Walzer argues that there is a radical distinction between war and civil life because (Points : 1) war is an intensely collective and collectivizing experience
the circumstances of war are intensely coercive in ways not found elsewhere in society
war is a world of pervasive uncertainty
all of the above
Question 41.41. What is Peter Singer’s point about performing vivisection on mentally disabled human infants? (Points : 1) That if we say that it would be wrong to perform experiments on such humans but not on non-humans then we are showing bias based upon species alone
That a good speciesist would not perform experiments on any being
That we should test upon mentally disabled human infants because the results would be more reliable than tests on animals
That anyone who would consider testing on a human infant is a monster
Question 42.42. According to the videos, in which is it legal to commit assisted suicide? (Points : 1) Canada
Mexico
Germany
Switzerland
Question 43.43. According to the video “Meet Your Meat”, which of the following is not
true of how animals are slaughtered on factory farms (Points : 1)They are driven in extreme weather conditions without food or water
They are often still conscious while being slaughtered
They are often roughly handled and severely injured by the time they make it to slaughter
They are ensured every means of avoiding fear and stress during the slaughtering process.
Question 44.44. If the Ring of Gyges really existed, (Points : 1) Just people would use it for justice.
Just people would not use it at all.
Unjust people would use it differently than just people.
Everyone would use it the same.
Question 45.45. Held uses this example to talk about the political distinctions that separate men and women in the realms of the public and the private (Points : 1) a business man going out for cocktails
a mother nursing her child
a city planner developing a building
a mother homeschooling her children
Question 46.46. According to Thomas Hill’s account of environmental ethics, a person might show a lack of virtue when they: (Points : 1) fail to realize that human needs and interests are worthless and unimportant.
fail find any aesthetic value in nature.
fail to recognize the rights of consentient beings.
All of the above.
Question 47.47. Aristotle conceives of a virtue as: (Points : 1) a rule that tells you what the right action is.
a state of character that enables practically wise choices.
a positive self-image.
a way to gain as much pleasure as possible.
Question 48.48. What happens to the offspring of dairy cows, according to the video “Meet Your Meat”? (Points : 1) They are taken away at a young age
They stay with their mothers until a healthy age
They are placed in animal sanctuaries
They go to pasture to become breeders
Question 49.49. What is Tom Regan’s position about the use of animals in research and agriculture? (Points : 1) Animals should be used whenever it can be proven that the human benefits outweigh the harms caused to the animals
Animals should never be used for medical research or commercial agriculture
Animals should only be used for medical research shown to be beneficial to humanity, never for agriculture
Animals should be used in both medical research and agriculture but should be treated as humanely as possible
Question 50.50. Robinson agrees with Aquinas’ idea that (Points : 1) Honor is a subjective quality
Honor is secondary to integrity
Honor must be displayed in action
Honor is secondary to magnanimity
None of the above
Cognitive Behavioral Interventions Prior to beginning work on this discussion please read pages 8 – 14 of the Bennett-Levy, Westbrook, Fennell, Cooper, Rouf, and Hackmann chapter of the google book Oxford Guide to Behavioural Experiments in Cognitive Therapy (2004), the Weck article (2013), and theCombs, Tiegreen, and Nelson article (2007).
Choose a specific disorder from the following list.
Anorexia or Bulimia
Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Depression
Anti-social Personality Disorder
Panic Disorder
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
Dependent Personality Disorder
Specific Phobias (public speaking, heights, animals, etc.)
Borderline Personality Disorder
For your initial post you will take on the role of a cognitive behavioral therapist. Create a fictional client experiencing your chosen disorder. Apply cognitive and behavioral theories to the client’s issue to develop a cognitive behavioral experiment you might use with this client. Use the first six of the seven steps for designing coginitive behavioral experiments outlined on page 33 of the Combs, Tiegreen, and Nelson article as your headings to outline your hypothetical experiment. Your initial post should be a minimum of 350 words.
Directions
Look up and read the following article in the EBSCOhost Database:
Step-by-step through the writing process. (2007). Writing, 30. 1-8.
(Note: You do not need to answer any of the questions from the reading in your assignment).
Read and respond to EACH of the following questions and submit them and your outline in a single document (both parts must be completed).
Part One: Topic Search
For the first part of this assignment, consider the following three questions:
What issue or problem would you like to write about?
Choose a side. What is your view on the issue? What is the opposing view?
What specific change might fix this issue?
Then, freewrite for 10-15 minutes about the topic you have chosen. Share all of the reasons you can think of for why your problem needs to be fixed. Do not worry about grammar, spelling, or format. Do not edit. Write what comes to mind. Do not research yet. If you are stumped and cannot write what you know for 10-15 minutes, go back to #1 and start with a new topic.
Part Two: The Outline
Draft an informal outline for your upcoming persuasive paper. Do not include quotations or paraphrased material. Your outline should be built from your current knowledge of the topic. You can refine this later when you conduct your research.
Basic Outline for a Five Paragraph Essay
Introductory Paragraph (five to seven sentences that include a hook, background information, and a thesis)
Body Paragraphs
First Topic Sentence
Supporting Point
Supporting Point
Supporting Point
Second Topic Sentence
Supporting Point
Supporting Point
Supporting Point
Third Topic Sentence
Supporting Point
Supporting Point
Supporting Point
Closing paragraph (five to seven sentences that include a restatement of the thesis, summary of the main ideas, and a closing thought)
If you are having trouble with your outline, the following link leads to a video that should help: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXWMPbfKtUI
Aristotle Regards Passions and Feelings Like Anger
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!