- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Analysing Differences Between Theory and Concept Research Assignment
Analysing Differences Between Theory and Concept Research Assignment
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Analysing Differences Between Theory and Concept Research Assignment
Instructions
Assignment: Part 1
Write an annotated bibliography of two theories and two conceptual framework models. Use your knowledge from Week 4 about writing an annotated bibliography. This week, you will keep the sources to only theories and conceptual frameworks. You may use any theories and conceptual frameworks you choose.
Name the theory or conceptual framework in a heading.
Write two or three paragraphs about the author, the concept of the theory or conceptual framework.
Write at least one paragraph of the use in history and today or why it is not used today.
Write a conclusion about your thoughts on the theory or conceptual framework.
Assignment: Part 2
Using the instruction below, access the SPSS page and create an account. Include a screenshot of this account in your paper. Write a paragraph of your experience getting to this stage.
NCU includes the IBM SPSS Statistics software as a component covered by the Course Materials Fee. You will need this software for your statistics course(s) and may wish to use the software for other courses and/or your dissertation.
Here are the steps to do so:
Register for an account using the SPSS page link in the weekly resources. Use your NCU email address during registration. If you have any problems registering for an account, please contact the NCU IT Service Desk: ServiceDesk@ncu.edu.
You will receive an email confirming your account has been created. Click on the link provided in the email to complete the registration process (step-by-step visual is also attached).
Download and install the software. Information about installation, common tasks, troubleshooting, and more can be accessed at IBM’s Knowledge Center link found in this week’s books and resources.
Include a screenshot of your open account (remove any account numbers or personal information) and add this page to your paper.
Length: 5-7 pages
Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks
Theframeisanabstractideathatencirclesastudy.The choice of the framework in adissertationreflects theunderstandingofthestudy’snature,howitexists,rolesadapted,andtoolsusedbytheresearcher.Theseframeworksaregenerallyblueprintingofthewholedissertation.
The framework is one of the first steps in dissertation writing.A concept is an abstract idea thatisbasedonactualphenomenathatconstitute thedata.Atheoryisasetofconcepts,and thetheoryclarifies the concepts (Grant & Osanloo, 2014).There are two types of frameworks indissertationwriting:Conceptual framework andTheoreticalframework.
A conceptual framework understands how the research problem is bestexplored, how the research will take a specific direction, and the relation between the variables. The conceptual framework generally offers a logical structure of the concepts. It includes formal theories, concepts, and findings from the literature. A DBA typically uses aconceptual framework for the dissertation.
A theoretical framework is a theoretical assumptionfor the larger context of a study. To examine a topic theoretical framework gives a uniqueperspective.Ph.D. and Applied Degree researchers include theoretical frameworks. The theoretical framework provides the groundwork for literature review, methods, andanalysis (Christine & Li, 2015). In this article, the author reviews two examplesof theoreticalframeworksandtwo examplesof conceptualframeworks.
TheoreticalFramework
Balogun, S. A. (2013). The effects of risk and size of company on business performance ininformation technology outsourcing (Ph.D.). Available from Dissertations & Theses @NorthcentralUniversity.(1400224467).https://proxy1.ncu.edu/login?url=https://www-
( 9 ) ( Dissertation Frameworks )
proquest-com.proxy1.ncu.edu/dissertations-theses/effects-risk-size-company-on-business- performance/docview/1400224467/se-2?accountid=28180
In this dissertation, the author, Shereef Balogun, addressed the problem to identify thecompany’s effects or risk on business performance resulting from Information Technologyoutsourcing.Theauthorcompletedaquantitativestudyto evaluatetheimpactofoutsourcingITonbusiness performance.
References
Balogun, S. A. (2013). The effects of risk and size of company on business performance ininformation technology outsourcing (Ph.D.). Available from Dissertations & Theses @Northcentral University. (1400224467). https://proxy1.ncu.edu/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.proxy1.ncu.edu/dissertations-theses/effects-risk-size-company-on-business- performance/docview/1400224467/se-2?accountid=28180
Christine, P. C., & Li, Y. (2015). Novices’ struggles with conceptual and theoretical framing inwriting dissertations and papers for publication. Publications, 3(2), 104-119.https://doi.org/10.3390/publications3020104
Grant, C., &Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoreticalframeworkindissertationresearch:Creatingtheblueprintforyour”house.”AdministrativeIssues Journal: Education, Practice & Research, 4(2), 12-26.https://doi.org/10.5929/2014.4.2.9
Layne, S. (2019). Job descriptions as a feedback tool: A quantitative study to improveperformance appraisal practices (D.B.A.). Available from Dissertations & Theses @NorthcentralUniversity.(2320971402).https://proxy1.ncu.edu/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.proxy1.ncu.edu/dissertations-theses/job-descriptions-as-feedback-tool-quantitative/docview/2320971402/se-2?accountid=28180
Munoz, E. (2017). Exploring morale, motivations, and commitment of employees affected byoutsourcing and divestiture (D.B.A.). Available from Dissertations & Theses @NorthcentralUniversity.(1960868768).https://proxy1.ncu.edu/login?url=https://www-
proquest-com.proxy1.ncu.edu/dissertations-theses/exploring-morale-motivations- commitment-employees/docview/1960868768/se-2?accountid=28180
Murphy,K.J.(2020).Intra-teamandinter-teamknowledgesharinginmultinationalcorporationagile projects: A qualitative phenomenological study (D.B.A.). Available from Dissertations& Theses @ Northcentral University. (2435230720). https://proxy1.ncu.edu/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.proxy1.ncu.edu/dissertations-theses/intra-team-inter-knowledge-sharing-multinational/docview/2435230720/se-2?accountid=28180
Analysing Differences Between Theory and Concept Research Assignment
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
