An Inventory for Measuring Clinical Anxiety Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
An Inventory for Measuring Clinical Anxiety Essay
contributions and theoretical insights, as well as providing a biographical sketch of their life…
You are to write an 8–10-page paper on an individual theorist of classical social theory, briefly explaining their major contributions and theoretical insights, as well as providing a biographical sketch of their life and work.
Research Paper Guidelines
Although the paper length is relatively short (8-10 pages), that does not mean that your paper’s content should be terse, superficial, or abbreviated in any way.
If you need more space, use it. The length of any paper is not the central focus of the work; the content is. As you decide on what to write, you need to be thinking about the disciplinary perspective that you choose to write from.
Although the subject matter is interdisciplinary in scope, most of you will be writing from a social science perspective following a narrative style.
However, if you are more familiar with the APA, MLA, or Chicago style, they will work just as well; just be consistent. In other words, good grammar is a requirement, not an option you choose. If you feel that your writing is in need of help, please use the UALR Writing Center; it exists to help YOU.
1. Unless otherwise stated, use either the APA or the Chicago style for formatting your report. If you choose the Chicago style, your report should follow the recommendations in the 14th or 15th editions of The Chicago Manual of Style. Acronyms, abbreviations, and jargon should be defined, unless they are well known.
2. Direct quotations should be used sparingly and must include an end-of-sentence superscript NOTE to the original source, shown in the NOTES section.
3. Avoid sex-specific terminology and the use of “man” or “men” as the generic for human being. Avoid male or female pronouns to describe individuals or people in general and use third-person plural (e.g., their) whenever possible.
4. Please give people’s full name as they are most known as on first usage. Thereafter, refer to both men and women by their last name. Do not include “Dr.”
5. Double-spacing should be used on every line of the entry.
6. No automatic hyphenation. Don’t right-justify text. Don’t use hard returns in the body of an entry. Use the tab key, not the space bar, for paragraph indents. Avoid the use of sophisticated formatting commands.
7. Spelling should be in American English (we recommend Merriam Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary).
8. For the Further Reading at the end of your report, please use the following general style reference style:
Book: Bennet, Michael. The Battle of Stoke: The Simnel Rebellion. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
New Edition: Bennet, Michael. The Battle of Stoke:
The Simnel Rebellion. 2nd ed. London: Stroud, 2002.
Book/Two Authors: Bennet, Michael, and Michael Hicks. The Towton Campaign of 1461. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2001.
Journal Article: Bennet, Michael. “The Battle of Bosworth.” English Historical Review 55 (1991): 105-17.
Editor: Bennet, Michael, ed.
The Reign of Henry VII. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.
Book Chapter: Hicks, Michael. “The Court of Star Chamber under Henry VII.” In Michael Bennet, ed. The Reign of Henry VII.
Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1997, pp. 23-39.
Dissertation: Bennet, Michael. “The Battle of Stoke: A Reinterpretation of the Evidence.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1987.
Paper Presentation: Hicks, Michael. “Henry VII and the Origins of the Council Learned.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Historical Association, New York, January 1997.
Article Available Electronically: Merwin, Sharon. Richard III and the Execution of the Duke of Buckingham [Online, August 2002]. Richard III Society Web Site. http://www.r3.org
NOTE: General websites with information on the topic should be included as well, such as American Indian Movement History http://www.aimhistory.org
- Please avoid the following: pushing an agenda, editorializing, or showing authorial bias, bulleted lists, ending the report with a summary (this should come first), numerous quotations, in-text citations (see above), reports dramatically longer or shorter than their assigned lengths, rhetorical questions, use of “I,” “we,” “you,” “us,” and generalities and digressions. Remember, this is an encyclopedic-type report.
- All reports should be formatted with 1.5” or 2” margins all around, in Times Roman 12, double spaced.
If you should choose the APAstyle, use the following guidelines:
Choose a topic
Explore your sources (articles, books, papers written about your topic)
Write your literature review (highlight what others have said about your topic—for some, this will be the main focus of your work since you may be simply compiling a report on an issue with some commentary)
Review current writings on your topic and remember you are documenting contemporary Native life
Write the main body of your paper (in addition to background material, what do you have to say about a topic that you chose
Review your work and summarize in a paragraph or two with some concluding remarks
Be sure to include a complete bibliography (references) section of at least ten sources (web sources should be few and be sure they are legitimate information sources such as sites ending with .edu, .gov, or .org)
Paginate and write in double-spaced, 12-point font.
I think you will find the research instructive since you choose the topic and it should be of interest to you. If you have real difficulty let me know and I will see what I can do to assist you.
An Inventory for Measuring Clinical Anxiety Essay
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!