- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
An Empirical Study of Penalties for Workplace Misconduct
An Empirical Study of Penalties for Workplace Misconduct
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
An Empirical Study of Penalties for Workplace Misconduct
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in understanding the effectiveness of penalties for workplace misconduct. Several empirical studies have been conducted to examine the impact of penalties on employee behavior and the work environment.
One study conducted by Jones and Robinson (2019) investigated the impact of monetary penalties on employee theft in retail stores. The study found that the use of monetary penalties was associated with a decrease in employee theft, suggesting that penalties can be an effective tool in deterring misconduct. However, the study also found that the effectiveness of the penalty depended on its severity and consistency of application. Penalties that were perceived as unjust or excessively harsh were less effective in deterring theft and could harm employee morale.
Another study conducted by Chen and Wu (2019) examined the impact of penalties on ethical behavior in organizations. The study found that penalties can be an effective tool in promoting ethical behavior, but their effectiveness depends on the employee’s perception of the fairness and consistency of the penalty. When employees perceived the penalty as just and fairly applied, they were more likely to comply with organizational policies and ethical standards. However, when employees perceived the penalty as unjust or inconsistently applied, it could result in negative attitudes towards the organization and reduce their commitment to ethical behavior.
A study by Hall and his colleagues (2021) examined the impact of penalties on workplace safety. The study found that the use of penalties for safety violations was associated with a decrease in accidents and injuries. However, the study also found that the effectiveness of penalties was dependent on their application. Penalties that were consistently applied and proportional to the severity of the violation were more effective in promoting workplace safety.
Furthermore, a study by Yerima and Singh (2018) investigated the impact of penalties on employee motivation and job satisfaction. The study found that the use of penalties had a negative impact on employee motivation and job satisfaction, particularly when the penalty was perceived as unjust or inconsistently applied. This suggests that the use of penalties should be carefully considered to ensure that they do not harm employee morale and job satisfaction.
In conclusion, the effectiveness of penalties for workplace misconduct depends on several factors, including the severity and consistency of the penalty, the employee’s perception of its fairness and consistency of application, and the organizational culture. The studies mentioned above provide empirical evidence that penalties can be an effective tool in promoting ethical behavior, deterring misconduct, and improving workplace safety. However, the use of penalties should be approached thoughtfully and carefully to ensure that they do not harm employee morale and job satisfaction. Clear communication, feedback, and the provision of opportunities for improvement can enhance the effectiveness of penalties and promote a positive work environment.
An Empirical Study of Penalties for Workplace Misconduct
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
