AMH 2020 The Great War of 1914 to 1919 Dissertation
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
AMH 2020 The Great War of 1914 to 1919 Dissertation
CHAPTER 23: PROTECTIVE OR DANGEROUS?
Instructions: After reading the chapter in the textbook, reading the module materials, and watching the videos, answer the following question:
In 1917, the US Government passed the Trading with the Enemy Act, the Espionage Act and then in 1918, the Sedition Act. Each of these acts dealt with “protecting” the US from our enemies in World War I. In your opinion, were these acts necessary and protective or did they infringe upon the First Amendment rights of Americans?
You are to answer the question with information from the course, and you are to respond to at least TWO other students’ responses.
Layla Kalil posted Mar 24, 2021 1:44 PM
World War 1 took place in the years 1914 to 1918. Before and during the war, any form of media and propaganda were very popular here in the US; Its main priority was to keep the citizens of its country informed at all times. During the war, they also used propaganda to instill confidence and patriotism into their citizens while they were away at war. Because of how easily they were able to put out information, it made leaders in the US wary. Wary because enemies could easily tune in on news reports happening in the US and they could get information that could potentially put them in an advantage and the US in a disadvantage. For example; they could find out when and where ships will depart from, to head to war or they could detect confidential information about our allies
. I’m not saying this information was released purposefully or that these exact examples have happened, but the thought process as important as these were what drew US leaders to make the acts that essentially, “censored”, it’s citizens; they wanted to be as cautious as possible, during war. To achieve this, they decided it was important to implement these three acts:
Trading with the Enemy Act, Espionage Act, and the Sedition Act. Many have thought to believe it was a violation of our first amendment right because citizens and reporters were limited to things they could post or say and were having to get approval before posting anything. I think that during the war, these measures were appropriate and necessary in order to protect the troops at war, the citizens back in the US, and all the confidential tactics being used against the enemies. It was a way to allow the US to fight in the war without having to worry about any external issues. However, I do not agree with using these acts against citizens after the war was over. It seems to me that several countries have used this “censorship” after the war just to have power over its citizens.
Courtney Grunbichler posted Mar 22, 2021 2:59 PM
The Trading with the Enemy Act, Espionage Act, and Sedition Act were all attempts to prevent Americans from siding with the enemies. During the beginning of the war, officials were on edge about the enemy forces, which is why they implemented these policies to prevent the criticism of America. However, I believe that the US did not have the constitutional right to implement the Sedition Act. I understand why the government would pass the Trading with Enemies Act to limit and restrict trade between Americans and enemy countries.
I also understand why the Espionage Act was passed. During a time of emergency or war, the president implements policies that are usually in Americans’ best interest. I believe the Sedition Act is unconstitutional though. The Espionage Act, which was passed in 1917, protected US information and the spread of it. It was passed in order to prevent spies or other traitors getting access to US military information. This was implemented to protect the US, so I believe it was necessary.
The Sedition Act, however, was unconstitutional. It prevented Americans from talking badly about the US, the flag, the military, and the government. Even during war, this is a direct violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution. It outlines the liberty of Freedom of Speech. The Sedition Act was an attempt to suppress and criticism or slander about the US to maintain full support. I believe that this act is unconstitutional because it punished Americans for expressing their first amendment right. AMH 2020 The Great War of 1914 to 1919 Dissertation
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!