Administrator-in-Training Rotation Experience
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Administrator-in-Training Rotation Experience
Criminal Law Discussion
Week 3 Assignment 1 – Administrator-in-Training Rotation Experience
Course Objective for Assignment:
Differentiate the diverse organizations that comprise the long-term care service delivery system including the future challenges faced by these organizations in the context of long-term care administration.
As an LTC AIT student your task this week will be to demonstrate the knowledge you have obtained from your first weekly rotations.
Report: This assignment will require you to complete the template provided below.
Complete and Submit the Three Sections of the Report for the Assignment: AIT Experience: LTC Settings and Services Report Template
Note: See each section for specific details on each section.
APA: Include APA 7th Edition Formatted Reference Page.
Note: See each section for references and in-text citation requirements.
Complete Section 1 of the Report
Select the LTC Settings and Services:
Two LTC facilities/settings from Your Week 2 Rotation. (LTC Living Arrangements/Facilities)
Some Examples: SNF, including short-term rehab and long-term care skilled nursing facilities, ALFs, ILFs, CCRCs, Memory Care Facilities, Psychiatric LTC Facilities, Pediatric SNFs, Hospice Facilities, Respite Facilities, Developmentally Disabled Facilities, LTC Mental Health Facilities, or other LTC Facilities – be specific.
Two LTC HCBS and/or Community Living Options from Your Week 3 Rotation. (LTC Community and Home-Based Services)
Some Examples: Hospice at home, Home Health Agencies, Palliative Care at home, Adult Day Centers, Homemaking Services, Personal Care Services, Senior and/or Development Disabilities meal services, Personal group homes, Senior Centers, Pediatric Illness Day Care Services, Companion Services, LTC Durable Medical Equipment Services, and other options for seniors/pediatric/mental health/ and developmentally disabled services provided in a home or community setting – be specific.
APA: Include a minimum of three APA 7th Edition formatted references with correlating in-text citations for Section 1. All scholarly references must be from the last five years.
Complete Section 2 of the Report:
Select Six Companies from the lists below:
Two Companies from List 1
Two Companies from List 2
Two Companies from List 3
Research Your Selected Companies: Respond to the questions provided in the LTC Settings and Services Report for each selection.
APA: You MUST cite each company, facility, and/or service presented in Section Two using APA 7th Edition Formatting. All additional scholarly references presented in this section must be from the last five years.
List 1: Select two companies from this list Genesis Healthcare: LTC Provider
The Ensign Group
Life Care Centers of America
Signature Health Care
Sava Senior Care
Good Samaritan Society
List 2: Select two companies from this list Brookdale Senior Living
Five Star Senior Living
Sunrise Senior Living
Atria Senior Living
List 3: Select two companies from this list Kindred at Home
LHC Group Inc.
Seasons Hospice & Palliative Care
Complete Section 3 of the Report:
AIT Rotation Experience Summary: Provide a brief analysis of any new insights, learning experiences, or new knowledge gained from the Week 1 through Week 3 rotations. The AIT Rotation Experience Summary should be 2-3 paragraphs long.
APA: Include a minimum of three APA 7th Edition formatted references with correlating in-text citations for your AIT Rotation Experience Summary. All scholarly references must be from the last five years, you may use prior references provided in the report for Section 3.
Administrator-in-Training Rotation Experience
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!