- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- support@phdwriters.us
Addressing Performance Issues in a Constructive Manner
Addressing Performance Issues in a Constructive Manner
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Addressing Performance Issues in a Constructive Manner
Addressing performance issues in a constructive manner is an important task for HR professionals. It is essential for maintaining a productive and efficient workplace, as well as for fostering a positive work environment. Here are some tips for addressing performance issues in a constructive manner:
Identify the specific issue: Before addressing a performance issue, HR professionals should identify the specific problem. This will help to ensure that the correct problem is being addressed and that the appropriate actions are taken.
Gather evidence: HR professionals should gather evidence of the performance issue. This can include data, reports, and any relevant documentation.
Schedule a meeting: HR professionals should schedule a meeting with the employee to discuss the performance issue. This should be done at a time that is convenient for the employee and in a location that is private and comfortable.
Communicate clearly: HR professionals should communicate clearly and calmly during the meeting. They should explain the performance issue, provide evidence, and outline the specific actions that need to be taken to improve the employee’s performance.
Listen actively: HR professionals should actively listen to the employee’s perspective and concerns. This will help to ensure that the employee feels heard and understood.
Show empathy: HR professionals should show empathy towards the employee and understand their perspective. This can help to build trust and rapport with the employee, making them more likely to take the necessary actions to improve their performance.
Avoid blame: HR professionals should avoid placing blame or pointing fingers during the meeting. This can make the employee feel defensive and less likely to take the necessary actions to improve their performance.
Set clear expectations: HR professionals should set clear expectations for the employee’s performance, including specific goals and deadlines.
Provide support: HR professionals should provide support to the employee, such as training or mentoring, to help them improve their performance.
Follow up: HR professionals should follow up with the employee to check on their progress and to provide feedback.
Give positive feedback: HR professionals should give positive feedback to the employee when they improve their performance.
Document the process: HR professionals should document the process of addressing the performance issue, including the meeting, the actions taken, and the results.
Communicate with other departments: HR professionals should communicate with other departments to ensure that everyone is aware of the performance issue and the actions being taken to address it.
Look at the bigger picture: HR professionals should consider the bigger picture when addressing performance issues. For example, if an employee is struggling with a new task, it might be more appropriate to provide additional training rather than disciplinary action.
Avoid micromanaging: HR professionals should avoid micromanaging the employee. Instead, they should provide guidance and support while allowing the employee to take ownership of their performance.
Keep the conversation private: HR professionals should keep the conversation private and not discuss the performance issue with other employees.
Review the process: HR professionals should periodically review the process of addressing performance issues to ensure that it is effective and to make any necessary changes.
Be consistent: HR professionals should be consistent in addressing performance issues. This means treating all employees the same way and taking the same steps to address performance issues, regardless of the employee’s position or seniority.
Seek employee’s feedback: HR professionals should seek employee’s feedback on the process of addressing performance issues and make necessary changes accordingly.
Identify the root cause: HR professionals should identify the root cause of the performance issue and address it accordingly.
Addressing Performance Issues in a Constructive Manner
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
