- Premium Academic Help From Professionals
- +1 323 471 4575
- academicperfect@gmail.com
A Critical Examination of Penalties for Workplace Infractions
A Critical Examination of Penalties for Workplace Infractions
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
A Critical Examination of Penalties for Workplace Infractions
Penalties for workplace infractions serve as a deterrent to employees engaging in misconduct and reinforce the importance of adhering to company policies and procedures. However, it is crucial to critically examine the nature of the penalties and their effectiveness in achieving the desired outcomes.
One of the most common penalties for workplace infractions is a verbal or written warning. Verbal warnings are often used for minor infractions and serve as an opportunity for the employee to correct their behavior before more severe measures are taken. Written warnings are more formal and may be used for more serious infractions. While warnings can be an effective way to address employee misconduct, they are not always enough to deter repeat offenders. Additionally, if warnings are not consistently enforced, employees may not take them seriously.
Suspension or temporary leave is another common penalty for workplace infractions. These penalties are often used for more severe infractions or repeated misconduct. The idea is to give the employee time to reflect on their actions and the consequences of their behavior. However, these penalties can have a negative impact on the employee’s morale and productivity, and they may feel unfairly punished, especially if the infraction was not intentional.
Termination of employment is the most severe penalty for workplace infractions. It is typically reserved for serious offenses, such as theft, violence, or harassment. Terminating an employee is a significant decision that can have long-lasting consequences for both the employee and the company. While termination can be an effective way to deter misconduct, it should not be used as a first resort. Companies should have clear policies in place that outline the behaviors that will result in termination.
One of the challenges with penalties for workplace infractions is ensuring consistency and fairness in their application. If penalties are not applied consistently across all employees, it can lead to a perception of favoritism or discrimination. Additionally, the severity of the penalty should be proportionate to the infraction. Overly harsh penalties can also be perceived as unfair and can damage employee morale.
Another challenge is ensuring that the penalties are effective in preventing future infractions. Penalties should be accompanied by clear communication about why the behavior was unacceptable and how to avoid similar infractions in the future. Additionally, it is essential to address any underlying issues that may have contributed to the behavior, such as inadequate training, poor supervision, or unclear policies.
In conclusion, penalties for workplace infractions are an essential tool for ensuring employee compliance with company policies and procedures. However, it is crucial to critically examine the nature of the penalties and their effectiveness in achieving the desired outcomes. Penalties should be consistent, proportionate, and accompanied by clear communication and support for employees. By approaching penalties in a thoughtful and strategic manner, companies can create a workplace culture that values compliance and ethical behavior.
A Critical Examination of Penalties for Workplace Infractions
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THE PROFESSIONAL ESSAY CUSTOMIZED FOR YOUY NOW – CLICK NOW!
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
