A Collaborative Learning Community Assignment
Order ID 53003233773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
A Collaborative Learning Community Assignment
This is a collaborative learning community assignment.
Your instructor will assign your CLC a marriage and family therapy case study.
As a group, complete the following:
Identify the important facts of your assigned case.
Choose the type of family therapy approach to use with this family.
As a group, write a 1,000-1,200 word paper or create a 20-25 slide PowerPoint presentation complete with lecture notes that includes the following:
A brief outline of the case.
A description of the family therapy approach chosen.
Assessment and therapeutic techniques to be used.
Evaluation methods employed.
A conclusion describing the expectations of treatment.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,
Write a 1,400- to 1,750-word paper in which you explain the importance of innovation in your selected business’s vision, mission, and values, and determine your business model for this new division. Include the following:
Propose a new product or service for the new company division. The division should be customer-focused with an innovative mission statement. Ensure that you are differentiating your product or service.
Describe how the division addresses customer needs and achieves competitive advantage.
Create a vision and a business model for this new division that clearly demonstrates your decision on what you want your business to become in the future.
Explain how the vision, mission, and value of the new division align with the company’s mission and vision.
Summarize how the vision, mission, and values guide the division’s strategic direction.
Define your guiding principles and values for your division in the context of culture, social responsibility, and ethics.
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
One of the key challenges facing health care managers and administrators is matching demand for services with resources. Not only do the right numbers and types of staff need to be hired, but staff members must be scheduled in way that is efficient yet maintains patient safety and other quality outcomes.
To prepare for this Discussion, select a unit or department in a hospital or other kind of health care organization that provides inpatient care, ancillary diagnostic services, or emergency services. Examples of these include perioperative services, the emergency department, ICU, the neonatal unit, imaging services, and laboratory services. Then consider the following in preparation for the Discussion:
Review Chapter 7 (Ozcan text) for a discussion of key factors of staffing, including the use of acuity systems and census information.
Also review definitions and examples of workload standards on pages 162–164 and throughout Chapter 7. Consider the ways in which workload standards help managers to staff and schedule their departments to meet volume demands. Through further research, try to identify workload standards that are typically used for this kind of unit.
Post by Day 4 a response to the following:
Identify your selected unit or department in the first line of your posting.
Discuss at least three key factors, as identified in the Learning Resources, that managers must consider when identifying the number and kind of staff for this particular unit or department. Explain why these factors are significant.
Identify at least one workload standard that is used in (or would be appropriate for) your selected unit or department, and explain how the workload standard would be used in the staffing process.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.
Respond by Day 6 to at least one of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways:
Ask a probing question.
Expand on the colleague’s posting with additional insight and resources.
Offer polite disagreement or critique, supported with evidence.
In addition to, but not in place of the above, you may:
Offer and support an opinion.
Validate an idea with your own experience
Network Design, Management, and Security Discussion
Week 7: Network Design, Management, and Security – Discussion
Cost Justification (Graded)
Cost-benefit analysis for our network decisions is a critical skill and ability in IS management. What could we do to impress the CFO with our submission? Let’s look at what they believe is important in an article from the source, CFO Magazine’s site. Our ability to sell technology recommendations to management often requires providing cost analysis and perhaps even hard dollar benefits. How the CFO in your organization thinks should be a good indicator of what will fly in terms of getting support from the finance department.
Each week students are required to submit reflective writing that will serve to integrate the concepts from each topic into memory and professional practice.
Answer the following questions:
What are the key points in this week’s readings?
Based on your experience, how can you apply content from these readings to your work as a counselor?
What insight did the readings provide into this week’s topic?
How has class discussion influenced your thinking on this topic?
Your weekly entry should be 150-250 words.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected
A Collaborative Learning Community Assignment
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://gradebasket.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!