Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Motivational Interviewing Is Aimed at Guiding Professionals Discussion Responses
DISCUSSION POST PEER RESPONSES. 60 WORDS EACH, APA FORMAT. 2 REFERENCES NEEDED AND CITED FOR 2 OUT OF THE 3 PEERS.
PEER #1 JAMAL
Motivational interviewing or MI is a counseling concept that helps guide the professional in conversation with their client about changing behaviors and striving to be the best representation of their self. Furthermore, “motivational interviewing focuses on exploring and resolving ambivalence and centers on motivational processes within the individual that facilitates change” (The University of Massachusetts, n.d). When it comes to integrated health this concept helps let the professionals who are involved in an individual’s care have an understanding on how ready and motivated the client is to start the process in changing behaviors for the purpose of improving overall health. An article published by The Global Advances in Health and Medicine explains some strategies of MI to include, but are not limited to open-ended questioning, focusing on change talk, exploring pros and cons of current behaviors, and setting goals and establishing’s plans that are unique and accessible to the client’s individualized needs.
In my future work within the mental health profession as it pertains to using motivational interviewing strategies, I feel as though my strengths would revolve around the techniques of using open ended questioning and using importance and confidences rulers such as questions using the phrase on a scale to 1 to 10. From this I believe that in the future I will have no issues with creating goals and plans based on the information received. On the other hand, because Motivational interviewing is based on conversating with individual clients, building rapport with the individual client in my past experiences has been and is going to continue to be a struggle. You don’t see a lot of African American males doing this type of occupation and I believe because of this it takes a little more effort for individuals to open and build that since of rapport.
Simmons, L. A., & Wolever, R. Q. (2013). Integrative Health Coaching and Motivational interviewing: Synergistic Approaches to Behavior Change in Healthcare. Global advances in health and medicine, 2(4), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2013.037
University of Massachusetts . (n.d.). a MI definition principles & approach V4 012911. Retrieved from https://www.umass.edu/studentlife/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Motivational_Interviewing_Definition_Principles_Approach.pdf.
PEER #2 MIRIAM
The purpose of motivational interviewing (MI) is the help resolve the client’s ambivalence about change (SAMHSA, 2019). There are four elements to MI that are important to take into consideration. These are partnerships, acceptance, compassion, and evocation (PACE). Partnership includes an active collaboration between the client and provider. Showing empathy and curiosity about the client’s perspective can help open communication. Acceptance is showing respect for the client and having an intent to understand a client’s point of view, even if you don’t agree with it. Compassion is shown as the provider actively promotes the client’s welfare in throughout treatment. Evocation takes into consideration the clients motivations, values, strengths, and resource (SAMHSA, 2019). Any provider within an integrative health setting can help explore and encourage a client’s motivation for change as they use the PACE components.
One of my strengths is my ability to listen with intent and show compassion and empathy through my interactions. Something I struggle with is that I tend to immediately offer a solution and try to invoke change, rather than let others talk through different solutions and identify their own motivation for change.
SAMHSA, (2019). Enhancing motivation for change in substance use disorder treatment. Retrieved from https://store.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/d7/pr…
PEER #3 TERRANCE
Motivational interviewing in an integrated health settings is essential to approaching discussion of substance use and substance use treatment that allows the primary care provider (PCP) to build a bond with the patient and generate feedback from them to be able to inspire and develop motivation to create positive behavior changes. The strategy that is useful in the office of an PCP is to provide an explanatory model that will help patients follow biopsychosocial foundation of substance use and substance-use disorders as well as the various paths to recovery. Behavioral health providers (BHP) advances on support for patients by implementing changes to medication and troubleshooting conformity challenges.
A key element that is beneficial towards my future is being an avid listener to people issues. Although I am not a licensed practitioner, helping others is beneficial towards inspiring our community to give their best despite the challenges they may have since it is only temporary and guide them to resources such as church to begin their transformation for a life worth living. The challenge I will encounter is prescribing medications to clients since I am fond of using holistic treatments to increase their quality of life that can be reevaluate with each visit.
Ratzliff, A., Unützer, J., Katon, W., Stephens, K. A. (2016). Integrated care: Creating effective mental and primary health care teams Wiley.
Chan, Y. F., Hsiang, H., Sieu, N., & Unützer, J. (2013). Substance screening and referral for substance abuse treatment in an integrated mental health care program. Psychiatric Services, 64.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!